Manali Singhal vs.ravi Singhal - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jan-29-2019

Court: Delhi

LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2, Order VII Rule 11, Order XII Rule 6, the Specific Relief Act

DATE: January, 2019, 20th November, 2017, 26th July, 2018, yesterday, today, 1st June, 1998, 6 days, 1993, 18 24, 1989, 3 to 4 years, April, 1994, the last so many years, the year 1998, 1908, the year 2000, 17th August, 2004, September, 2004, 25th November, 2011, 5th March, 2012, 20-4-1994, 1994, Respondent‟s, 20th April, 2004, the last two years, the end of May, 1993, 18 8. II, 21.11.1995, 14th April, 2001, 27.12.1997, 11.9.1997, about 1800-2000, 19.1.1999 to January, 2000, 20th April, 1994, 1973, 21st November, 1995, 2nd July, 1994, 3rd July, 1994, 8th July, 1994 and 1st, August, 1994, 4th November, 1994, November, 1994, 18, October, 2018, six months, 18 20, Del 11489, Del 12684, 1975, 2002, Del 7414, six years, 18 27, 1979, Del 12384, 2010, Del 2360, Del 1925, 2019, 18th February 2019

PERSON: Abhimanyu Bhandari, Tanmay Mehta, Ankit Virmani, Rinkel Singh, Krishan Tewary, Nimisha Narayan, Prosenjeet Banerjee, Meera Menon, Vinita Sashidharan, Deepak Singh Rawat, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1, Aurangazeb Road, justice.22, Divya, Shreya, Bhandare, M.P., H.C. Bhandare, Divya Bhasin, No.345556/2001, Olof Palme Marg, Vasant Vihar, Divya Singhal, Gurcharan Kaur v. Ranjeet Singh, Alok Mahajan, S. Dastane, Inderjeet Mehta, SCC706 GVN Kameshwar Rao Vs, G. Jabilli, Prem Chandra Pandey, Uma Rani Vs, Kumar 2015, S. Vs, No.232/2018

ORG: Advs, the Court of Principal Judge, Family Courts, Patiala House Courts, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Suit for Specific Performance, Suit No.25is, the Supreme Court of India, High Courts, CPC, a Revision Petition, Court, Revision Petition, the Family Court, Annexure C & D, the Delhi High Court, Shri H.C. Bhandare, Shri M.C. Bhandare, M.P., CBI, Supreme Court, The Family Court, the High Court, the Times of India, Manali Bhandare, SLP, Specific Performance, Divorce, Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, Order VI Rule, Suit, agreed.16, the Supreme Court, NG Dastane Vs, the Hindu Marriage Act Rules, Cruelty, Trial Court

CARDINAL: 1, 18, 18 to 24, 2, 4.11.94, 37, 21.11.95, 28.10.97, 3, 4, 5, two, 6, 20, 7, 5.8.1994, 8, one, 9, 1 to 11, 8,9,10, 11, 10, 24, 19, 12, 17, 13, 7(i, 136, 14, 15, 16, 21

GPE: New Delhi, England, Delhi, India, Rs.40,000/=, Spain, California, DP

ORDINAL: first, 4th

PRODUCT: Respondent, Newspaper, Respondent No.1, No.1, Family

LOC: Respondent

WORK_OF_ART: the Agreement of 4.11.1994, Lalit Kumar Vs

TIME: late night

NORP: Corrected, RAJIV