R vs.m V - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jan-24-2019

Court: Delhi

LAW: Section 19, the Family Court Act, Section 28, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13, Section 12, Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure,, Section 125 Cr, Section 9, Section 13(1, Hindu Marriage Act, Section 498A/406 IPC, the D.V. Act

MONEY: ~9

DATE: January, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C., 13882/2017, 1955, 19.09.2003, September, 2003, the year 2005, 1860, 1973, 25.07.2011, Rs.2,000/- per month, 2012, less than two years, 2002, 15.09.2003, 29.09.2003, February, 2004, 05.02.2004, the month of February, 2004, 2003, a single day, 31st July, 2002, 2019 ssc

PERSON: Tripurari Jha, Brajesh Kumar, Nitish Sharma, G.S. SISTANI, JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL, Jha, Page 2, Savitri Pandey, Prem Chandra Pandey, Rekha, Manoj Vasishth, Shri Suresh, Bhuaji, Rekha Vs, Bua, Jagdish, Fufa, Buaji, Shri Jagdish, J.JYOTI SINGH

CARDINAL: 1, 9 2, two, 29.04.2005, 31.03.2015, 9, 3, 4, 6, 2, 24, 25, 5, 01.02.2004, 13.09.2012, No.2, 7, 31.07.2002, 8

ORG: the Hindu Marriage Act, APP, the Family Court, CAW, FIR, IPC, the Trial Court, MAT, the Protection of Women, Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka Courts, no.1, no.2, The Family Court, Smt, Chowki In, U/s 9, Chacha, dismissed.10, CM No.13882/2017

GPE: F.C., Delhi

NORP: Hindu, desertion.3

FAC: Police Station-Uttam Nagar

LOC: East Uttam Nagar