Devi vs.state - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: May-15-2017

Court: Delhi

LAW: Section 306, Section 306, Section 498-A IPC.When Babita, Section 313 5, Section 306, Section 306 of IPC, Section 306 IPC

DATE: May 15th, 2017, 11.12.2001, a period of, two years, Rs.25,000/-, six months, about 3 years, three years, 11, 20.03.1999, 4-5 days, 12, that day, 2001, the day, 18, MAY15 2017

PERSON: No.3/2002 DEVI, R.P. Kaushik, Akshai Malik, Ranveer, J.JUDGMENT1, Devi, Babita, Babita, Section-306 IPC, Ravi Dadhich, Davender Verma, Devi Singh Sharma, Radha Kishan, Arvind, Savita, Crl, Babita, Devi Singh Sharma, Ravi Dadhich, Crl, Kumar v. State of Chattisgarh, Crl

ORG: Additional Public Prosecutor, JUSTICE, Additional Sessions, IPC, Safdurjung Hospital, Smt, SI, SI, SI, SI Arjun Chauhan(PW-6, PW-7, SI Rajbir, Additional Sessions, IPC, Additional Public Prosecutor, State, Additional Sessions, Court, Supreme Court, an Executive Magistrate, Apex Court, Court, Court, Crl

GPE: New Delhi, Delhi, Safdurjung, Ramesh

CARDINAL: 06.12.2001, 1, 2, 25.03.1999, 26.03.1999, 4, as many as 9, 1, 2, 9, 6, 7, 3, 9, only one, 4, 9 10, only one, 26.03.1999, 5, 9, 4, 6, 9, 4, 16, 9, 7, 9, 19, 8, 9, 20, 9, 9

PERCENT: 100%, 100%

FAC: PW-4

PRODUCT: Smt

NORP: Sanjay

TIME: about 48 hours, about 48 hours

EVENT: SCC618 17