Skip to content

Sofyan vs.state - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Mar-30-2017

Court: Delhi

LAW: Section 10 of POCSO Act and, Section 10 POCSO Act, Section 354 IPC, Section 164 Cr, Section 10 of POCSO Act

DATE: 2017, MARCH30 2017, 15.12.2015, five years, five years, around eight years, the next day, around eight years, next day, next day, next day, around eight years, the very next day, next day, the previous day, around eight years, 11.10.2005, around eight years, around 27 years, March 30, 2017

PERSON: Jitendra Bharti, Naushad, Appellant Alam, Amit Gupta, Addl, Sessions Case, Principal, 313 Cr, Learned Addl, Principal, Civil Line Zone, Crl

ORG: APP, JUSTICE, FIR, PS Prashant Vihar, Rigorous Imprisonment, Crl, Bal Bharti Public School, First Information Report, the Principal of the School, FIR, PW-2, Crl, MCD, Trial Court

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 10.12.2015, 5,000/-, 5,000/-, 1, 6, 164, eleven, 2, 6, 164, 2, 3, 6, 4, 6, about ‘X’s, 5, 6, 15, 6, 6

TIME: 02.07.2014 in the evening, 02.07.2014 in the evening

GPE: Rohini, Delhi, Cr, P.C., P.C., Cr, P.C., P.C.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //