Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Central Excise vs.m/s u.k. Paints (I) P. Ltd.
Decided On : Dec-01-2016
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 35A, Page 1, Rule 57 F, Rule 57 F(3, Page 3, Section 35B, Rule 57F(3, Section 35B(1, Rule 57F(4, Page 5, Rule 12, Rule 57 F, section 35 EE of the Act, Section 55EE.8, Page 6, Rule 57F
CARDINAL: 12.2016, 27.01.2011, 1, 1, 2, 7, 2, 3, 01.03.1987, six, 3, 25.09.2003, 13, 7, 4, 28.02.1999, 22.02.1999, 6, 24.11.2003, 4, 7, 12, 3, 3, 5, 7, two, 7, 22.02.1999, 7
PERSON: Pramod Kr, Rai, Deepak Anand, Naveeen, Parth Mullick, JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE, Notification, interalia, Notification No.18/99-CE, Collectorate, merit, third S. RAVINDRA BHAT
ORG: M/S U.K.PAINTS (I, DEEC, CESTAT, the Commissioner (Appeals, Section 35B of the Act, the Central Excise Rules, DEEC Scheme, DEEC Scheme, the Customs, Excise & Service, Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, the DEEC Scheme, Court, CESTAT, DEEC, the Range Office, Range, CESTAT, the Central Government, CESTAT, Government, the Central Government’s, Tribunal’s, MODVAT, benefit.5, Tarn Taran, Distt, CESTAT, Court, CESTAT, the Central Government, CESTAT, the Central Government, the Central Excise Rules, Proviso, Govt, the Revision Application, Government, the Central Government, Court, Court, DEEC, CESTAT, Court, Court
DATE: 1944, 1949, 1993-94, 1996, 18.03.1998, 28.11.2001, 1986, 28.12.1990, 24.11.2003, 1944, 1944, 1944
GPE: India, Nepal, Bhutan, Assessee, USSR, Assessee, USSR, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, New Delhi, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee
ORDINAL: third, first, third, second, third
NORP: CESTAT.11