Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Central Excise vs.m/s u.k. Paints (I) P. Ltd.

Decided On : Dec-01-2016

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 35A, Page 1, Rule 57 F, Rule 57 F(3, Page 3, Section 35B, Rule 57F(3, Section 35B(1, Rule 57F(4, Page 5, Rule 12, Rule 57 F, section 35 EE of the Act, Section 55EE.8, Page 6, Rule 57F

CARDINAL: 12.2016, 27.01.2011, 1, 1, 2, 7, 2, 3, 01.03.1987, six, 3, 25.09.2003, 13, 7, 4, 28.02.1999, 22.02.1999, 6, 24.11.2003, 4, 7, 12, 3, 3, 5, 7, two, 7, 22.02.1999, 7

PERSON: Pramod Kr, Rai, Deepak Anand, Naveeen, Parth Mullick, JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE, Notification, interalia, Notification No.18/99-CE, Collectorate, merit, third S. RAVINDRA BHAT

ORG: M/S U.K.PAINTS (I, DEEC, CESTAT, the Commissioner (Appeals, Section 35B of the Act, the Central Excise Rules, DEEC Scheme, DEEC Scheme, the Customs, Excise & Service, Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, the DEEC Scheme, Court, CESTAT, DEEC, the Range Office, Range, CESTAT, the Central Government, CESTAT, Government, the Central Government’s, Tribunal’s, MODVAT, benefit.5, Tarn Taran, Distt, CESTAT, Court, CESTAT, the Central Government, CESTAT, the Central Government, the Central Excise Rules, Proviso, Govt, the Revision Application, Government, the Central Government, Court, Court, DEEC, CESTAT, Court, Court

DATE: 1944, 1949, 1993-94, 1996, 18.03.1998, 28.11.2001, 1986, 28.12.1990, 24.11.2003, 1944, 1944, 1944

GPE: India, Nepal, Bhutan, Assessee, USSR, Assessee, USSR, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, New Delhi, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee

ORDINAL: third, first, third, second, third

NORP: CESTAT.11

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //