Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vibha Vs. Arun

Decided On : Sep-14-2016

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

LAW: Section 13(1)(i-a, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13-B, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13(1)(i-a, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13-B, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13-B, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13(1)(i-a, the Hindu Marriage Act

PERSON: Kum, Indira Jain, Rahul Dharmadhikari, Khisti

CARDINAL: 2, 3., 4, two, 5., two, 26, two, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 10, 16, 17, 2, 18, 10, one, 19, 10, 20, 10, 21, one, 22, 23, 24

ORG: the Family Court, Wardha, Engineer, Wardha, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Laptop Service Center, I.B.M. Company, Husband, Pune, the Police Station, the Police Station, Pune, Police Station, the Protection of Women, Lloyd Steel, Wardha, Wardha, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Wardha, Wardha, Pune, Wardha, Pune, Rs.7,50,000/-, Family Court, Family Court, the Family Court, Family Court, Court, Family Court, Family Court, Learned Counsel, Family Court, Learned Counsel, Family Court, Learned Counsel, the Family Court, Court, Amravati, the Family Court, the Family Court, the Family Court

GPE: Amravati, Amravati, Amravati, Amravati, Amravati, Amravati, Counsel

DATE: 30-12-2015, 1955, 11-03-2000, 12th, four year old, 2009, 2010, months, the year 2011, July, 2011, August, 2012, 10-03-2013, eight year old, 11-03-2013, the same day, 13 years, 10-03-2013, 07-10-2013, 2005, two years, 2011, the month of August, 2012

ORDINAL: third, third

LOC: Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune

TIME: 01.30 pm to 10.30 pm, late in the night

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //