Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Vibha Vs. Arun
Decided On : Sep-14-2016
Court : Mumbai Nagpur
LAW: Section 13(1)(i-a, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13-B, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13(1)(i-a, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13-B, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13-B, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13(1)(i-a, the Hindu Marriage Act
PERSON: Kum, Indira Jain, Rahul Dharmadhikari, Khisti
CARDINAL: 2, 3., 4, two, 5., two, 26, two, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 10, 16, 17, 2, 18, 10, one, 19, 10, 20, 10, 21, one, 22, 23, 24
ORG: the Family Court, Wardha, Engineer, Wardha, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Laptop Service Center, I.B.M. Company, Husband, Pune, the Police Station, the Police Station, Pune, Police Station, the Protection of Women, Lloyd Steel, Wardha, Wardha, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Wardha, Wardha, Pune, Wardha, Pune, Rs.7,50,000/-, Family Court, Family Court, the Family Court, Family Court, Court, Family Court, Family Court, Learned Counsel, Family Court, Learned Counsel, Family Court, Learned Counsel, the Family Court, Court, Amravati, the Family Court, the Family Court, the Family Court
GPE: Amravati, Amravati, Amravati, Amravati, Amravati, Amravati, Counsel
DATE: 30-12-2015, 1955, 11-03-2000, 12th, four year old, 2009, 2010, months, the year 2011, July, 2011, August, 2012, 10-03-2013, eight year old, 11-03-2013, the same day, 13 years, 10-03-2013, 07-10-2013, 2005, two years, 2011, the month of August, 2012
ORDINAL: third, third
LOC: Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune, Pune
TIME: 01.30 pm to 10.30 pm, late in the night