SA Vs. AA - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Mar-22-2016

Court: Delhi

LAW: Section 28, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13(1)(ia, Section 406, Section 498A IPC, Section 498A., the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 146, the Evidence Act, Section 138, Section 146 of the Evidence Act, Section 146 of the Evidence Act, Food Adulteration Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2., One, 3., one, 4., 5., one, one, 6., 202, 20, 4,25,000/-, 4,25,000/-, 8, 844, 200, 23, 23, 9, 10, 115, 10, 114, 7, 10, 11, one, 11, 2, 406, 34, 8, 9, 10, 12, 50, 50, 13, 14, 24, One, 25, 15, 16, 17, 239, 7, 1998(1, 867, 3, 28, 18, 146, 19, 45, 45, 20, 21, 22, 23, 177, 24, TOH, 25, 10, 10, one, 26, 27, 29, 30, two, 23, 33, 28.06.2006, 34, 36, 4.25, 38, one, one, 560, 5, 2, 111, 39, 486, 8, 41, 42., 20, two, 43, 146, 138, 146, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 14, 6, 67, 44, 13, 1, 2, 3, 14, 6, 67, 45, 6, 46., 47, 48., 50

ORG: Karkardooma Courts, PW-2, ADJ, ADJ, ADJ, DLT, Court, the Trial Court, The Trial Court, Court, Neelu Chopra v. Bharti, the Supreme Court, IPC, The supreme Court, inter alia, The High Court, Court, IPC, State, ADJ, ADJ, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, ADJ, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, ADJ, Rajinder Pershad, U.P., State, Court, Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, ADJ, the Trial Court, ADJ, inter alia, Dastane, AIR 1975 SC, Court, Akhilesh Chaudhary, SHADI, Neelu Chopra, Reliance, PW-2, The Trial Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Bank of India, Ors, the Supreme Court, AC 495, State, Sudhanshu Sekar Misra, AIR 1968, Bhavnagar University, P) Ltd., The Supreme Court, BPCL, Court, Court, Court, the Trial Court, The Trial Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Rajinder Pershad, Court, inter alia, Court, inter alia, Rajinder Pershad, Rajinder Pershad, the Supreme Court, inter alia, State, U.P., inter alia, Rajinder Parshad, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, The House of Lords, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, ADJ, PW-2, inter alia

GPE: Delhi, Delhi, India, Delhi v. Rakesh, PW-2, PW-2, Ghaziabad, Santro, Orissa, L.C., Browne, L.C., Browne, Nahar, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad

DATE: 03.02.2005, 07.05.2006, 2013, 2010(1, 2009, 498A, 2012, 1334, 498A, 2001, 1998, 1985, 1985, 11.02.2005, 11.02.2005, March 2005, 1534, 28.06.2006, 28.06.2006, 29.06.2006, the previous days, 05.07.2006, 05.07.2006, 31.10.2006, 11.02.2005, 18.06.2006, 05.07.2006, 31.10.2006. 28, 32, several nights, 29.06.2006, the previous day, 05.07.2006, 35, 37, 2009, 1901, 2003, 2004(2, 2004, 40, 1998, 1893, 1893, Srichand, about 17-18 years, 11.02.2005, 49, 28.06.2006, 29.06.2006, 05.07.2006

ORDINAL: first, firstly, Secondly, Firstly, first, first

PERSON: Mehta, Mehta, Mehta, Mehta, Sher Mohammad v. Mohan Magotra, Suman Singh v. Sanjay Singh, Mehta, Mehta, Suman, Mehta, Mehta, Mehta, Mehta, Suman Singh, Suman, Sher Mohammad, Darshana Devi, Nahar Singh, Shivan Das, Sher Mohammad, Suman Singh, Singh, Seema, YEH, HAIN KYONKI, KARI, Mehta, Rahul, Mehta, Sher Mohammad, Sher Mohammad, Anr, v. K. Mohandas, Palitana Sugar Mill, NR Vairamani, Singh, Sher Mohammad, Sher Mohammad, Sher Mohammad, Sher Mohammad, Nahar Singh, Sher Mohammad, Nahar Sing, Herschell, Dunn, Nahar Singh, Nahar Singh, Herschell, Dunn, Sher Mohammad, Sher Mohammad, Sher Mohammad, Mehta, kerosene, Mehta

LOC: Additional District

PRODUCT: DLT 638, Srichand, Section 138, Section 138, 3 SCC 561

NORP: Sanjay, Sanjay, Sanjay, Sanjay, Suman, Suman, Sanjay, Sanjay, Sanjay, Sanjay, RW-2, Rahul, PW-2, PW-2, PW-2, Quinn v. Leathem, L 4.25

WORK_OF_ART: Mota Hathi', Mota Hathi', Mota Hathi'

TIME: the night of, the morning, about 12:30 p.m., the night, early hours of, the night of, early hours of, about 12:30 p.m., about one hour, about 12:30 p.m.