Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Nemappa Vs. Bhimanna and Another
Decided On : Mar-14-2016
Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
LAW: Rule 81, Rule 81, Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 75
PERSON: S. Sujatha, Award, Insurer, Tom-Tom Vehicle, S. Iyyapan, Mohmmed, Mohd, Haneef v. Mallayya, Kusum Lata, S. Iyyappan, Swaran Singh
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 17, 62, 5, 6, 2011, Form-4, 28-3-2001, 8., 4, 28-3-2001, 14, Form-4, 20-3-2001, 20-3-2003, 2004(1, 221, 28-3-2001, 28-3-2001, 200/-whereas, 54, 9, 28-3-2001, 2, 10, 14, Form-4, 11
ORG: Claimant, Court, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No, Muddebihal, Tribunal, Learned Counsel, Claimant, Tight, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Learned Counsel, the Apex Court, United India Insurance Company Limited, AIR 2013 SC 2262, the Insurance Company, Learned Counsel, the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, Court, Mallappa, ILR, the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, Learned Counsel, the Judgment of the Apex Court, Satbir, AIR 2011 SC, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Court, National Insurance Company Ltd., Administrative, Court, the Apex Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., AIR 2004 SC 1531, the Apex Court, Central Motor Vehicles Rules, the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal
DATE: 19-02-2011, 2013, 1989, 2064, 2015, 28-03-2001, 1988, 1234, 2015, 2011, 3093, the 1st, 28-03-2001, 1994
PERCENT: 6%
PRODUCT: Award, Rule 14 of the Rules, Rule 14 of Rules, Form-4
NORP: Rules, Rules
WORK_OF_ART: 3 SCC 646
GPE: Mohd, L.Rs, Mohd, G.S.R.
ORDINAL: first