Pradeep Kumar Gupta Vs. State of U.P.

Decided On : May-12-2015

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 71(6, Chapter X of the Act, Section 70(1, Section 71(6, Chapter-X, Section 68(3, Section 97, Section 16, Section 6, Section 41, Section 42, Section 49, Chapter, Section 65, Section 66, Section 74, Section 76, Section 79, Section 80, Chapter X, the Indian Penal Code, Chapter the Adjudicating, section 68, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, section 196, the Indian Penal Code, section 195, Chapter XXVI, the Limitation Act, Section 68, Chapter, Section 70, Section 68, Section 70, Section 71, the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, Chapter X of the Act, Section 68, Section 71, Article 20(2, the Constitution or Section 300, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 226 and /, Constitution, Chapter X of the Act of, Section 70(1, Section 71 of the Act of, Section 70(1, Section 68, Section 71(6

PERSON: Pankaj Naqvi, J. Heard Sri Santosh Yadav, Sri Vimlendu Tripathi, Sri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, Agra The, Sri Vimlendu Tripathi, SEBI Vs, Radhey Shyam Kejriwal, Sri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, Sri Yadav, Mukhtar Singh, Reasons, namely:--, SEBI Vs, Radhey Shyam Kejriwal, Mukhtar Singh, Narayan Rao Vs, Lal Bhagwan Das, Bench, Sri Rajiv Lochan Sukla

ORG: A.G.A, Amicus Curiae, the Food Safety and Standards Act, Agra, the Food Safety Officer, Designated, the Food Safety Officer, District Magistrate, the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal, FSAT, A.G.A, Court, A.G.A, the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal/, the Appellate Authority, Food Safety Appellate Tribunal, the Apex Court, M.C.T.M. Pvt. Ltd, Sri Ram Mutual Fund, Amicus Curiae, A.G.A, the Civil Court, Tribunal, Court, State, U.P., AIR 1957, the Food Safety, Food Safety, Court, Court, Food Safety Officer, Special Court, Chapter IX, Tribunal, F.S.O, unhygienic, Court, Court, Special Courts, the Special Court, Special Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the Commissioner of Food Safety, Court, Sections 41 to 80, Special Court, the Ordinary Criminal Court, Adjudication and Food Safety Appellate Tribunal, Additional District Magistrate, the State Government, the Central Government, The Central Government, the State Government, the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal, The Central Government, the State Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Government, the State Government, Tribunal, the Central Government, Tribunal, the Central Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the State Government, District Magistrate, Regulations, Civil Court, IPC, Court, Sections 345, the Central Government, the State Government, the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal, U.P., the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Government, Tribunal, Civil Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Sections 68, the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal, the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal, the Civil Court, The Apex Court, M.C.T.M. Pvt. Ltd, the Apex Court, Mukhtar Husain, State, AIR 1953, SC, The Apex Court, Sri Ram Mutual Fund, the Apex Court, Court, Regulation, Enforcement, Sri Ram Mutual Funds, the Apex Court, the Enforcement Directorate, Court, the Apex Court, AIR 1965, SC, the Apex Court, the High Court, the Bombay High Court, M/s Nagpur Cable Operators Vs, AIR 1996, Court, the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal, the Civil Court, the Ordinary Crminal Courts, Sections 68, Court, the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, A.G.A., the Food Safety and Standards Act, the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal, the Food Safety and Standards Act, Court, The Registrar General, Court, Court, Amicus Curiae

CARDINAL: 1, 17.3.2015, 19.2.2015, Rs.5, 2., 3., 9.11.2012, 19.2.2015, Rs.5, 4, 17.3.2015, 344, 5, 361, 3, 581, 5, 6, 505, two, 8, 9, 50-58, 59 to 64, two, 10, 11, 68, 2, 3, 193, 228, 345, 346, 2, 4, 70, 2, 3, one, 4, 5, 71, 5, 2, 5, 3, 193, 228, 2, 4, 5, 6, 12, 3, 193, 228, 446, 4, 13, 3, 5, 14, 6, 15, 71, 3, 1, 2, 16, 17, 5, 361, 18, two, 3, 38, two, one, 19, 20, 180, 226, 227, 227, 21, 6, 23, 20.7.2015

DATE: 2006, 10.11.2012, 2006, 1954, 1996, 2006, 2011, 2006, 2006, 1954, 2006, 14 days, 3 years, 3 years, 59-64, the period of one year, 3 years, 6 years, 68, 70, 71, 45 of 1860, 1973, section-49, 1908, 1908, 45 of 1860, 1973, 1963, 36 of 1963, sixty days, sixty days, 60 days, 70, 1996, 1947, 2006, 2011, 38, 1818, 2006, 70, 2006, 2006, 2006

GPE: District Judge, Addl, Sections 49, District Judges, Bombay, Police, Bombay

PERCENT: 50%, 50%, 50%

LOC: the District Judge

ORDINAL: first, second

TIME: under this Act, 71 of the Act

PRODUCT: 325

WORK_OF_ART: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, Bench (Criminal