Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Decided On : Feb-11-2014

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 161(1, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 354, Section 71, Section 161, Section 161, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Page 4, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Chapter VI, Section 70 of the Act

PERSON: A.M. Sapre, Guwahati, Commanding–in-Chief

CARDINAL: 16, 1, three, 511, 2, 5, one, 1.9.2011, two, 13.12.2011, 1, 12.1.2012, 2, 23.3.2012, 3, 5, four, four, 5, four, 5, 5, three

DATE: 2012, 12.01.2012, a period of 3 months, 3 months to one month, 11.11.2011, a period of, 3 months, 3 months to 1 month, three months to one month, three months, one month, 3 months

ORG: 11.6.2013, the Armed Forces Tribunal, Tribunal, the Government of India under Section 161, the Air Force Act, Eastern Air Command, Indian Air Force, Tribunal, Air Force, the Indian Air Force, Clerk General Duty, Air Force Bus, Tinsukia Railway Station, the Air Force, the Air Force, District Court Martial, IPCode, Air Force, D.C.M, Air, DCM, DCM, Government of India, O.A, Tribunal, Tribunal, O.A, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal

GPE: O.A., O.A.

ORDINAL: First

TIME: hours

NORP: Indian

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //