Mukesh Bansal Vs. State and anr

Decided On : Jul-16-2014

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 465/408 IPC, Section 482, Section 482, Section 320 of the Code, Section 482, Section 307Indian Penal Code, Section 307 Indian Penal Code, Section 482, Section 482, Section 307 Indian Penal Code, Section 307 Indian Penal Code

PERSON: ~24, Shikha Pandey, O.P. Saxena, R.K. Handoo, MISRA %, M.A. No.10618-19/2014, O.P. Saxena, R.K. Handoo, R.K. Handoo, Chartered Accountant, Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, Narinder Singh, Anr, Dasti

ORG: STATE & ANR, State, SI Kuldeep PS Connaught Place, Mukesh Bansal under Section 482, Police Station Connaught Place, Sections 420/468/471 IPC, the Trial Court, Additional Public Prosecutor, State, Court, State, the Supreme Court, SC, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Public Servants, the High Court, the High Court, Section 307 Indian Penal Code, FIR, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, FIR, Police Station Connaught Place, Sections 420/468/471 IPC, the Indigent & Disabled Lawyers’ Fund of Bar Council of Delhi, Court, Registry, MISRA

LOC: R-2

GPE: P.C., New Delhi, New Delhi

CARDINAL: 12, No.2, 10, 27, two, Rs.75,000/-

DATE: November, 2013, the year 2004, the year 2004, about ten years, 2012, three weeks, today

MONEY: SCC303

PRODUCT: 2014 AK