Skip to content

Jagdish Vs. the State and anr - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Oct-14-2014

Court: Delhi

LAW: Section 482, Section 498A/406/34 IPC, Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 13B(2, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 320 of the Code, Section 307Indian Penal Code, Section 307 Indian Penal Code

MONEY: ~5, SCC303

DATE: 3898/2014, 3898/2014 1, 1973, 04.08.2007, today, 2012, 2013, 2014

PERSON: Karam Hussain, O.P. Saxena, Roshan Lal, PS Nangloi, S.D. Pushkar, MISRA %, J.(ORAL, notice.3, Seema, Jagdish, Gian Singh v. State of, Singh, Anr, MISRA

ORG: THE STATE & ANR, State, FIR, Court, the Executing Court, the Mediation Centre, Lacs, No.205570, the Supreme Court, the High Court, SC, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Public Servants, Section 307 Indian Penal Code, Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors, Babita Raghuvanshi & Anr

LOC: R-2, success.8

GPE: MISRA, proceedings.16

FAC: Police Station Nangloi

ORDINAL: second, first

CARDINAL: 06.05.1984, 23.07.2014, 2, 10, 67, 1, 29.2, two, 29.3, 29.4, 29.5, 29.6, 29.7, 4

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //