Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Avinash Vs. Ganpat and Others
Decided On : Feb-27-2014
Court : Mumbai Nagpur
LAW: Section 72, the Constitution of the Trust, the Change Report, Section 22, the Second Appeal, Section 22
CARDINAL: 1, 4, 2, 3, 6, 4, 5., 2, 905, 6, 6, 10,000/-, 2, 8, 5, 545, 9, one, 10, 1, 405, 11
ORG: the Bombay Public Trusts Act, Nagpur rejecting Change Report and Regular Civil Appeal No. 5 of 2009, Court, Trust, Trust, Learned Joint, Trust, Learned Counsel, Committee, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Scheme, Scheme, above&oelig, Rs.1,00,000/- be called œPatron Member, Authority, Patron, Learned Counsel, L.J. 654, Learned Counsel, Court, Seshammal, Hon'ble Supreme Court, High Court, the Public Trust, Court, Trust, Honble Supreme Court, Joint, Authority, Court, Joint
DATE: 1950, 10-08-2009, 15-06-2012, Rs.10,000/-, 1995, 1993, 1056, Sardar, 2001, 2006, the modern day, 1978, the legendary days, Today
EVENT: Bombay Act
PRODUCT: Judgment
LOC: the District Judge, F. M Irani
ORDINAL: second, Second
WORK_OF_ART: law:-, the Scheme of the Trust, Judgment and Order, The Second Appeal
NORP: Joint, Anglo
GPE: Rs.1,00,000/-, Rs.1,000/-, Vinayakvs, L.J., LomdasVs State, New Delhi, Kautilya
PERSON: Nagpur, MohinderSingh Gill, Adam