Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Avinash Vs. Ganpat and Others

Decided On : Feb-27-2014

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

LAW: Section 72, the Constitution of the Trust, the Change Report, Section 22, the Second Appeal, Section 22

CARDINAL: 1, 4, 2, 3, 6, 4, 5., 2, 905, 6, 6, 10,000/-, 2, 8, 5, 545, 9, one, 10, 1, 405, 11

ORG: the Bombay Public Trusts Act, Nagpur rejecting Change Report and Regular Civil Appeal No. 5 of 2009, Court, Trust, Trust, Learned Joint, Trust, Learned Counsel, Committee, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Scheme, Scheme, above&oelig, Rs.1,00,000/- be called œPatron Member, Authority, Patron, Learned Counsel, L.J. 654, Learned Counsel, Court, Seshammal, Hon'ble Supreme Court, High Court, the Public Trust, Court, Trust, Honble Supreme Court, Joint, Authority, Court, Joint

DATE: 1950, 10-08-2009, 15-06-2012, Rs.10,000/-, 1995, 1993, 1056, Sardar, 2001, 2006, the modern day, 1978, the legendary days, Today

EVENT: Bombay Act

PRODUCT: Judgment

LOC: the District Judge, F. M Irani

ORDINAL: second, Second

WORK_OF_ART: law:-, the Scheme of the Trust, Judgment and Order, The Second Appeal

NORP: Joint, Anglo

GPE: Rs.1,00,000/-, Rs.1,000/-, Vinayakvs, L.J., LomdasVs State, New Delhi, Kautilya

PERSON: Nagpur, MohinderSingh Gill, Adam

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //