Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ramesh Ram Vs. State of Uttarakhand

Decided On : Apr-30-2013

Court : Uttaranchal

LAW: Section 313 Cr, Section 376/511 of I.P.C., Section 504 of I.P.C. 6, Section 376/511 of I.P.C.

PERSON: U.C. Dhyani, Victim Km, Parwati Kapkoti, Patti Patwari, Ramesh Ram s, Chandan Singh, Ramesh Ram, Leela Devi, F.I.R., Ka-5, Ramesh Ram, PW1 Km, Parwati Kapkoti, PW2 Ramoli Devi, Chandan Singh, Usha Upreti, PW5 Hayat, Singh Goswami, Ramesh Ram, Ramesh Ram, Chandan Singh, Chandan Singh, Narayan Singh, Patwari, Chandan Singh, salvaar, Usha Upreti, V.K. Shukla, Usha Upreti, Chandan Singh, Chandan Singh, Ramesh Ram, Parwati, Parwati, Chandan Singh, PW2 Ramoli Devi, Ramesh Ram, Giri Goswami, Ramesh Ram, Ramesh Ram

DATE: J. 1, 17.08.2005, 18.08.2008, 2.50 p.m. 4, two years, that day, class 8th, less than two days, about 18 years, two years

GPE: Lamgarha, Dabri, Parwati, P.C., Rs.1,000/-

ORG: District-Almora, Ramesh Ram, Ratan Ram, District-Almora, first Information, Emergency Medical Officer, Almora, the Court of Sessions, victim),PW3, Ramesh Ram, 3x2 c.m., PW1 (Parwati, Ramesh Ram, the Honble Bombay High Court, the Honble Court, I.P.C, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Lower Court, Court

CARDINAL: 2, 376/511, 354, 504, 506, 3, 504, 5, Five, 1,000/-, 17.08.2005, 8), one, 9, 10, 11, 18.08.2005, 18.08.2005, 2.50, 1, 2, 2.5x0.5, 1.5c.m, 3, 6c.m, 4, 3.5, 1, 2, 3, no. 4, 12, 18.08.2005, 10.25, 1, 2., 3., 4., 13, 14, 15, about 5-6 years ago, 16, 17, 4, 18, 19, 376/511, 20, 21

TIME: about 2.00 p.m., 5.30 p.m., 2.00 p.m. On, around 12.00 hours

FAC: Police Station Lamgara, PW1 Parwati Kapkoti

NORP: Patwari, Patwari

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //