Jaymala Devi Vs. State Bank of India Represented Through Regional Manager and Ors

Decided On : Jul-25-2017

Court : Jharkhand

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Payment of Gratuity Act, section 5.8, Payment of Gratuity Act, Hindu Marriage Act, Provident Fund Act

CARDINAL: 1, 5523, 2, one, 29.05.2015, 2, 2, two, one, two, 3, 29.07.2015, 27.10.2015, 4 5, 2, 3, 5, 2, twenty-six, fifteen, 3, ten, 4, 5, 6, one, 7, 2

DATE: 2015, 11 January, 2017, the age of 25 years, 1972, 1972, 1955, 1972, less than, five years, six months, fifteen days, three months, the year, seven days, each season, monthly, the fifteen days, monthly, a period of, three months

PERSON: Jaymala Devi, S.B.I. Colony, Tel Mill Gali, Piska More, P.O. Hehal, District- Ranchi., Petitioner Versus 1, Court Compound, P.S-Kotwali, Court Compound, P.S-Kotwali, Deoki Devi, Pipara Toli, District Lohardaga, Jaggai Chainpur, District Gumla, Rajeev Ranjan Tiwari, Ratnesh Kumar, Adv, Deepak Roshan, Pramath Patnaik, J.:1, Thakri Uraon, Oraon, Oraon, Kumar Oraon, Tripti Kumari, no.3 Smt, Deoki Devi, Kumar Oraon, Prateek, Kumar Oran, Tripti Kumari, lien, Oraon, Tripti Kumari, Oraon, Oraon, Kumar Oraon, Tripti Kumari, Kumar Oraon, Section-6(3, Pramath Patnaik, J.

ORG: House, P.S. Sukhdeonagar, State Bank of India, R.B.O, State Bank, 5th Floor, State Bank, Regional Business, 5th Floor, Village-Kundo, P.S-Chainpur, Thakri Uraon, State Bank of India, no.2, Court, Court, P.F Fund, PF Fund, Bank, Prateek Kumar Oron, the Payment of Gratuity Act, Form-A Provident Fund Nomination, Late Thakri Uraon, Bank, the Provident Fund of, Santosh, the Provident Fund, the Payment of Gratuity Act, the Hindu Marriage Act

GPE: Ranchi, Ranchi, Ranchi, Ranchi, Jaipur, Uraon, P.F., Prakeek, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, Prateek, no.3, no.3, no.3

FAC: Block Road, Block Road

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second, first

PRODUCT: no.1, Family, no.1

NORP: no.3

PERCENT: 40%, 30%, 30%

WORK_OF_ART: forfeited]-