Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Horne Vs. Flores

Decided On : Jun-25-2009

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Article III, Article III, Constitution, Proposition 203, Title III, Academic Achievement Act, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, Title III

PERSON: Horne, FLORES, Nogales, Lujan, Rufo, Frew , Rufo, Frew, Milliken, Bradley, Rufo, Nogales, Nogales, Alito, J., Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, J., Stevens, Souter, al, al., Horne, THOMAS C. HORNE, al, al., al, Alito, 88 Stat, Order, Appellee State, Art, n. , App, Cert, 480 F. Supp, CV, App, Nogales, Lujan, Seldin, al, n. 9, W]e, Rufo, Agostini , Felton, Jenkins, Lopez , Kennedy, J., Jenkins, Thomas, J., e.g ., McConnell, Duke L. J. 1265, Frew , Ragsdale, Turnock , J., Frew , App, Rufo, Frew, Milliken, Bradley, Frew , Milliken , al, Frew , 540 U. S., the Declaratory Judgment, Rufo, Rufo, we]re, Milliken , Castaneda , Jenkins, Thomas, J., 480 F. Supp, Nogales, Fourth, Cert, Ann, §15–756.01(C, §15–756.09, Language Enhancement, Wright, Cooper, Cooper, Nogales, 480 F. Supp, Nogales, Addendum, Nogales, Nogales, Cert, Milliken , al, Art, Kimel, n. 2, Breyer, Rufo, Rufo, n. 8, Alexander v., App, Nixon, Busing, Nixon, ESL Programs, K. Torrance, Ed, App, Cert, e.g ., App, Hanushek, A. LeFevre, Adult Success, e.g ., U. S. Chamber of Commerce, S. Fuhrman, Introduction, S. Hanushek, al., e.g ., Schoolhouses, al, Cert, Ed, az.us, Clerk, Horne, THOMAS C. HORNE, al, al., al, Breyer, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Language Learner, Rufo, Nixon, Busing, Nixon Address, Lau, Nichols, H. R. Rep., Gomez, Valeria G. , Wilson , Language Learner

DATE: 2009, 2008, 20, 2009, June 25, 2009, 1974, 2000, the years, 2006, many years, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000, JJ, 2009, 2009, June 25, 2009, 1992, 1974, 20 U. S. C. §1703(f, 2000, 2001, the next eight years, the intervening years, 1992, 2d 1225, 1226 (2000, 2d 989, 1009, 1981, August 1999, seven years, January 2000, 1239, the years, October 2000, 2d 1043, 1047, June 2001, 2001, 1028369, June 25, 2001, January 31, 2002, January 2005, 90 days, December 2005, the beginning of the 2006, the January 28, 2005, 2d 1112, 1120, June 2001, February 2006, December 2005, March 2006, 2000, 2-year, 2064, a]fter nine months, 3d 1140, 1153, 16 (CA9 2008, 55, 2000, April 2006, 2-year, Apr. 25, 2006, 181a–182a, April 2006, 2006, 2d 1157, 1167, 2007, 1165, Oct. 10, 2007, 3d 1140, 2000, 1156, 1169, 1702, 2009, 1992, 2009, 1975, 1164, 2d 1260, 1263, 1990, 22, 1977, 1992, 1997, many years, 70, 99 (1995, 1995, 1987, 1983, 2003, 2003, CA7 1991, 1987, 40, Tomorrow, today, 2006, 1977, 2000, 1163, 1167, 1168, 1172, 1164, 1170, 1163, 1167, 1171, 1169, 2000, 20 U. S. C. §1703(f, 2d, 1009, August 2006, 1165, today, last year, 1161, 1160, 2000, 20 U. S. C. §1703(f, November 2000, West 2009, 2004, 2005, annually, 6823, 1154, 1961, 2000, 1156, 1156–1157, 1157, 1168, 2000, 1160, 2000, 1169, 1170, 1227, 2000, 1171, 38, 1992, 2009, 73 (2000, 1997, 1983, 1140, 1146, 2008, 1165, nearly a decade, 22, 1992, 2-year, 20 U. S. C. §7902, 1166, 7902, 1178, 7902, 2064, 7902, 1175, 2001, 40, 1972, 1972, the next year, two years, 1990–1994 (1994, 2006, July 2004, no more than three months, more than a year, 1175, 46, 24, 1154, 2000, 2006, 2000, 2006, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2005–2006, 2005–2006, annual, 1157, 1169–1170, 1155, 97, the 2005–2006 school year, 2003, 2008, 5 (1996, 2005, 2007, 2004, 1994, 2007, 2009, 2000, 2006, 2000, 2006, 2000, 2006, 1155, Each year, 2000, 2001, 2007, 63, 17–18,, 21, October, Grade 1, 17, 2009, June 18, 2009, 2009, 2009, June 25, 2009, the year 2000, 20 U. S. C. §1703(f, 2d 989, 1010, 1981, 1992, eight days, the intervening years, 20 U. S. C. §1703(f, 2000, 1974, 20 U. S. C. §1703(f, 1972, 1974, The same year, 1972, 1981, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2d 1030, 1041, 1987, 1982, 2d 1007, 1017–1018

ORG: SUPREME COURT, the united states court of appeals, ELL, State Board of Education, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, ELL, the Nogales Unified School District, the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of, the Federal District Court, State, ELL, ELL, ELL, The District Court, the District Court’s, ELL, District Court, The State Board of Education, State, the State House of Representatives, the State Senate (Legislators, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, The District Court, The Court of Appeals, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, ELL, EEOA, Court, Legislators, State, State, The Court of Appeals, The Court of Appeals, the District Court’s, The Court of Appeals, State, the State Board of Education, The Court of Appeals, ELL, the District Court’s, The Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, EEOA, State, ELL, the Court of Appeals, The District Court’s, ELL, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, EEOA, ELL, SEI, ELL, the State Department of Education, SEI, SEI, Congress, NCLB, NCLB, EEOA, NCLB, State, ELL, ELL, ELL, ELL, ELL, ELL, The Court of Appeals, ELL, EEOA, the District Court, State, ELL, the District Court, ELL, the District Court, Court, Arizona House of Representatives, NOS, THE ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRE- SENTATIVES, the united states court of appeals, Court, ELL, the Nogales Unified School District, State, the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of, State, the District Court, State, the District Court’s, the Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, State, ELL, State, ELL, ELL, the District Court, the Nogales Unified School District, Board of Education, Superintendent of Public Instruction, ELL, State, State, Congress, EEOA, the District Court, State, ELL, ELL, ELL, the District Court’s, the District Court, State, ELL, EEOA, State, State, ELL, ACM, State, State, State, State, the District Court’s, State, the District Court, ELL, ELL, ELL, the District Court, The State Board of Education, the State Board of Education, the State House of Representatives, the State Senate (Legislators, Legislators, The District Court, Legislators, the District Court’s, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, the District Court, HB 2064, ELL, ELL, ELL, TUC, RCC, the Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit, the District Court’s, Fed, District Court, ELL, State, State, the District Court, State, RCC, The Court of Appeals, ELL, the Court of Appeals, ELL, The Court of Appeals, Congress, NCLB, Earth Island Institute, the Court of Appeals, EEOA, the State Board of Education, the Executive Branch, Reply Brief, State, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Arizona House of Representatives, the Arizona Senate, Legislators, Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., O]ur, State, Insulate Policies, Political Change, Horowitz, Decreeing Organizational Change:, Judicial Supervision of Public Institutions, R. Sandler & D. Schoenbrod, EPA, Kleinfeld, Flaum, Justice, American Legislative Exchange Council, the Federal Consent Decree Fairness Act, American Legislative Exchange Council, State, State, the District Court’s, EEOA, EEOA, The Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, ELL, EEOA, the Court of Appeals, ELL, The Court of Appeals, the District Court’s, The Court of Appeals, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, the state Board of Education, State, State, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, the District Court’s, The Court of Appeals, ELL, ELL, the Declaratory Judgment, the District Court’s, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, State, The Court of Appeals, ELL, ELL, ELL, ELL, the District Court, Emphasis, the Court of Appeals, EEOA, State, EEOA, ELL, the Court of Appeals, EEOA, the Court of Appeals, District Court, Ninth Circuit, the District Court, Fed, Ninth Circuit, The District Court, the District Court, the District Court’s, ELL, The District Court, Court, The District Court, the District Court, the District Court, The District Court, the District Court, ELL, the District Court’s, the District Court’s, the District Court, Court of Appeals, the District Court, Court of Appeals, EEOC, ELL, the District Court, ELL, the District Court, The District Court, State, EEOA, State, ELL, Congress, NCLB, the District Court’s, ELL, SEI, SEI, the State Department of Education, SEI, the State Board of Education, SEI, ELL, SEI, the Arizona State Department of Education, SEI, NCLB, NCLB, Congress, NCLB, NCLB, ELL, State, NCLB, State, State, NCLB, ELL, the Federal Department of Education, State, State, The Court of Appeals, NCLB, NCLB, State, ELL, NCLB, NCLB, State, ELL, the Court of Appeals, ELL, NCLB, ELL, NCLB, ELL, Nogales’ ELL programming, NCLB, the Arizona House of Representatives, NCLB, ELL, NCLB, ELL, Congress, The Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, ELL, ELL, the District Court’s, the Court of Appeals, Cooper’s, ELL, The District Court, Cooper, EEOA, Cooper, Reply Brief, the Arizona House of Representatives, The Court of Appeals, Cooper, the Court of Appeals, ELL, ELL, The Court of Appeals, the District Court, EEOA, ELL, ELL, State, ELL, the Court of Appeals, EEOA, EEOA, EEOA, State, ELL, State, ELL, the District Court, EEOA, the District Court’s, the District Court’s, State, ELL, EEOA, the District Court, ELL, State, ELL, State, the District Court, the Federal or State Government, the District Court, State, State, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, the District Court, EEOA, the Nogales School District, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, Footnote 1  , Congress, Congress, the Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit, EEOA, Los Angeles Branch, Los Angeles Unified School Dist, the Court of Appeals, the District Court’s, the Court of Appeals, the District Court’s, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, the District Court’s, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, NCLB, State, State, State, State, Amicus Curiae, the Court of Appeals, NCLB, NCLB, U. S. Department of Education, State, State, EEOA, State, Congress, the Equal Educational Opportunities Act, Address, the Nation on Equal Educational Opportunity, EEOA, American Unity Legal Defense Fund, New York City Board of Education, Educational Progress of Students, SEI, SEI, SEI, SEI, NCLB, EEOA, the Court of Appeals, NCLB, NCLB, EEOA, State, EEOA, the District Court, NCLB, State, the State Department of Education, the U. S. Department of Education, The State Board of Education, ELL, Reply Brief, ELL, ELL, non-ELL, State, ELL, The Court of Appeals, AIMS, ELL, the District Court, Nogales’ ELL programming, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, AIMS, the Court of Appeals, ELL, the Court of Appeals, AIMS, American Legislative Exchange Council, State, G. Burtless, Introduction and Summary, The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement, Hanushek & Raymond, J. Pol’y Analysis & Mgmt, State, Redesigning Accountability Systems, S. Fuhrman & R. Elmore, M. Springer & J. Guthrie, the School Finance Legal Process, School Money Trials 102, W. West & P. Peterson, E. Hanushek & A. Lindseth, Courthouses, the Funding-Achievement Puzzle, ELL, the Arizona House of Representatives, Reply Brief, ELL, The Court of Appeals, the District Court, Oral Arg, the District Court, Research and Evaluation Section, Enrollment by School, District, Court, SUPREME COURT, NOS, THE ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRE- SENTATIVES, the united states court of appeals, The Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Arizona Senate, the Arizona House of Representatives, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Federal District Court, State, the Arizona Board of Education, The District Court, The Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, State, State, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, Court, the District Court, State, Court, Court, Nation, the Nation on Equal Educational Opportunity, Court, Congress, the Court of Appeals, the Fifth Circuit, ND Cal 1998, No Circuit Court, the District Court’s

ORDINAL: ninth, ninth, First, Second, Third, Second, First, first, second, Third, First, Second, Third, fourth, second, first, first, second, seventh, First, Second, Third, 15th, first, ninth, First, Second, Third

FAC: English Language-Learner, English Language-Learner, Kelt Cooper

GPE: Arizona, States, Pp., Pp., Suffolk County Jail, Pp., Pp., Pp., Pp., Pp., Pp., Arizona, Pp., Pp., Nogales, Arizona, Ginsburg, Arizona, States, Arizona, Arizona, Arizona, Arizona, Nogales, Id., Arizona, Arizona, Ariz., HB, Arizona, the State of, Arizona, HB, Arizona, Arizona, United States, Arizona, Arizona, Arlington Heights, Suffolk County Jail, Missouri, United States, Easterbrook, Arizona, Arizona, Arizona, Arizona, Arizona, Arizona, Arizona, Ariz., Arizona, States, States, the State of, Arizona, Arizona, States, Arizona, §1703(f, Nogales, Nogales, the State of, Arizona, Ariz., New York, United States, Hawaii, Arizona, Florida, Arizona, Arizona, Suffolk County Jail, HB, United States, Arizona, Pres, The United States, United States, Arizona, Arizona, Suffolk County Jail, Arizona, Nogales, Arizona, Arizona, Pres, Illinois State Bd, Educ, United States, Texas, Nogales, Arizona

PERCENT: 20 U. S. C. §1703(f, 20 U. S. C. §1703, 115 Stat, 20 U. S. C. §6842, 555 U. S., 555 U. S., 521 U. S., 502 U. S., 20 U. S. C. §1712, 502 U. S., 433 U. S., 515 U. S., 20 U. S. C. §6311(b)(2, 515 U. S., 433 U. S., 505 U. S., 556 U. S., 521 U. S., 20 U. S. C. §§1702(a)(1, 414 U. S. 563

NORP: Nogales, Nogales, Nogales, Nogales, Nogales, English, Amici, Nogales, Nogales, English, English, §, Nogales, Nogales, Nogales, Nogales, Nogales, Mexican, Nogales, Amici, English, English, Laggards, d., Mexican, Spanish

LOC: HB 2064, HB 2064, HB 2064, HB 2064, HB 2064, HB 2064, HB 2064’s, HB 2064, HB 2064, HB 2064, HB 2064, HB 2064, HB 2064, HB 2064’s, HB 2064, Fourth, HB 2064’s, HB 2064, HB 2064’s, Title III, Title III

CARDINAL: 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, 1, 560–561, 2, 10–34, 60(b)(5, 367, 384, 380, 441, 60(b)(5, 381, 442, 282, 14–23, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, 14–15, only one, 60(b)(5, 18–20, at least four, 23–34, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, four, 25–29, 60(b)(5, 32–34, 3, 34–36, 516, 08–294, 557, 08, 08, 08–294, 515, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, 172, 1, 648, 172, 2d, 160, 92–596TUCACM, 2, 92–596, 5, 393, 15, 405, 1120–1121, 60, two, three, 516, 57, 60, 60(b)(5, three, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, 204, 580, 60(b)(5, 86, 516, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, 560, 560–561, at least one, 4, 498, 516, 498, 914, 264, at least one, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, 367, 384, 383, 203, 215, 60(b)(5, 3, 380, one, 580, one, 131, 295, 317, 1294–1295, 170, 441, 340, 855, 941, 2d 501, 517, 19, 442, 1a–4a, 60(b)(5, 381, 442, 282, 441, 442, 282, 1, 60(b)(5, 516, 60(b)(5, 4, 60(b)(5, 20–21, 60(b)(5, 442, 2    , 516, 1167–1168, 60(b)(5, 384, 516, 60(b)(5, one, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, three, 282, 648, 131, 204, 582, 2d, 6, 60(b)(5, four, 12, 480, 2d, 28, 1161–1163, 1163–1165, 12, three, 11, 13, 14, two, 8, 13, one, 15, at least four, 1    , 08–294, 369a, 203, 9, 15–756.02(A, 10, 60(b)(5, 2, 1703(f, two, 516, 1172–1176, 60(b)(5, four, 12, 13, 516, 14, 15, 16, 6812(9, 17, 18, 642, 651, 3, 2d, 19, 15, 516, 20, 60(b)(5, 4    , five, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 172, 2d, five, 21, 516, 60(b)(5, 22, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, 23, one, 239, about one-half, 177a–178a., 89–90, 280, one, 144, 169, 12, 1, 2, 5, 507, 520, 5, 714, 2d 946, 950–951, 516, 516, 15–16, 60(b)(5, 26, one, 60(b)(5, 60(b)(5, 502, 367, 480, 2d, 516, 31–32, 516, 275, 286–287, 289–290, two, 648, 1981)—sets, three, 1, 2, 3, 1009–1010, 13, 8, 590, 591, 593, 1, 591, 9, 10–12, Three, 2002–2003, 24, 24, eighth, 12, 516, 480, 2d, 1160–1161, 13, 516, 29–31, 13, 310–311, 312, three, 17, 113, 18, 24, 297, 298, 3–9, 151–176, 19, 121, 14–15, 116–118, 516, 22, 08–294, 431a, 23, 60(b)(5, 26, 557, 08, 08, 08–294, 60(b)(5, 648, 367, 384, 60(b)(5, 41, 2, 10, one, 60(b)(5, 2, 50, 50, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 1    , 204, 88, 515, 8, 590, 591, 566, 6, 2    , 648, three, 811, 680, 2d 356, 371, 12, three, 3

TIME: 8–10, 6842(b

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, Spanish, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English, English

MONEY: 23–25.          (ii, $500,000 to, $2 million, over $20 million, approximately $80, one per cent, 24, 2, 1,644,029.00, 3,074,587.00, 216,000.00, 466,996.00, 261,818.00, 322,900.00, 3,139, an estimated $3,570, 5,677, an estimated $6,412, an additional $526, an estimated $953, 895,891, 1,674,407

EVENT: the Arizona Constitution’s, HB 2064, the Arizona Constitution, the Arizona Constitution’s, the Arizona Constitution, HB 2064, Title II

WORK_OF_ART: Nominal, The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies, Does Money Matter

PRODUCT: the Declaratory Judgment, Structured English, App

QUANTITY: 516 F. 3d

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //