Hemanta Kumar Mishra Vs. State of Orissa and Others

Decided On : Dec-06-2012

Court : Orissa

LAW: Rule 35, Rule 35 of Rules 2004, Rule 35, Rule 35, Rule 35, Rule 35, Rule 35, Rule 35, Chapter-VI, Constitution, Section 141(2, Rule 22, the MMDR Act, the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, Section 15 of MMDR Act, Article 48A, Article 51A(g, Article 21 of the Constitution

PERSON: W.P.(C, Kumar Mishra, B.K. Nayak, Addl, P.K. Muduli Addl, B.N. Mahapatra, Sairat Misc, Trilochan Nanda, Nanda, B.K. Nayak, Item, Schedule III, Schedule III, Sairat, Schedule-III, Law, Meerut, A1 Faheem, Mahesh Chandra v. Regional, Pachaivappa, Madras, M. Bhaskaran Pillai, Sairat, V. State, Haryana, Kumar’s, MoEF, The Model Rules, MoEF, MoEF, Cuttack Dated

DATE: 2012, about 34 years, 2004, the year 2010-11, 24.04.2010, 27.04.2010, 14.09.2010, 25.04.2012, 2004, Rule 35, Item 1(i, 2006, 2007, 1993, 1993, 1994, 1995, 3458, 1997, 2002, 2011, 2009, 1957, 2006, 1957, 07.07.2009, 11, 1960, 5 years, 2010, 2010, March, 2010, March, 2010, a period of, six months, 14, five years, year, 6th December, 2012

CARDINAL: 226, 227, 12.2012, 22.03.2012, 2, 35, 37, 19.01.2011, 26.07.2010, 3, 26.07.2010, 22.03.2012, 28.04.2012, 35, 35, 22.03.2012, 1(i, 6, 198.SC, 198.SC, 13, 8, 8, 198.SC, 1722.Sterling, 1, 445, 2, 279, 1, 475, M.D., 4, 595, 5, 432.and, 3, 496).23, 93(2002, 9, 18(3, 22.03.2012, 10, 24.03.2009, eight, 1, 5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 3m, 8), 13, 17, five

GPE: India, Balangir, Balangir, Opp, Bolangir, Ac.5.00, Bolangir, Bolangir, Bolangir, Bolangir, Bolangir, Bolangir, Odisha, Bolangir, Bolangir, Bolangir, Bolangir, Bolangir, Balangir, Bolangir, Bolangir, Haryana, Nagar Nigam, Kerala, Bolangir, I.A., States.19

ORG: S/o. Binayak Mishra, Orissa & Others For Petitioner : M/s., Trilochan Nanda & S.N.Mishra, Standing Counsel, Plot No.79/B-1, the Orissa Minot Minerals Concession Rules, Plot No.79/B-1, Collector, Bolangir, Government, No.2943, Revenue, Disaster Management Department, No.29304, Stone, Collector, Government, State, Tahasildar, Notice/Advertisement, Government, Tahasildar, the Collector and Collector, Government, Additional Government Advocate, Court, Plot No.79/B-1, miNo.5, OMMC, Chapter-VI, Schedule-III are:- Ordinary, Supreme Court, State of, M/s Hind Stone, Sachidanand Pandey & Anr, State, West Bengal & Ors, AIR, Supreme Court, Ram & Shyam Co., State, Supreme Court, State, Supreme Court, Government, State, Supreme Court, Aggarwal & Modi Enterprises, P) Ltd. & Anr, New Delhi Municipal Council, NDMC, NDMC, Government, AIR, Computers Ltd., M and N Publications Ltd., UP Financial Corporation, Contromix Pvt. Ltd., New India Public School, HUDA, AIR 199.SC, State, Haryana Financial Corporation, Jagdamba Oil Mills, Court, Jagannath Pradhan Vs, Orissa & Ors, State, State, Supreme Court, Deepak Kumar, Special Leave Petition (C, Supreme Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, the State Governments under Section 15, Core Group, E&F, Group, Core Group, Core Group, State, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Ministry of Mines.18, Core Committee, States and Union Territories, Regional Environmental Management Plan, the Mineral Concession 12 Rules, the Ministry of Mines, The Minot Minerals Conservation and Development Rules, the State Government, The State Government/Union Territories, the State Governments and Union Territories, the Ministry of Mines, Supreme Court, MoEF, Government of India, the Model Rules, Supreme Court, the States and Union Territories, the Ministry of Mines, the Ministry of Mines, the State Government, the Minot Minerals Concession Rules, the Ministry of Mines, Government of India, the Core Committee, the Government of India, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, J.V. Gopala Gowda, C.J.I, Orissa High Court

LOC: Tahasildar, Tahasildar, Tahasildar, Tahasildar, Tahasildar, Tahasildar, Tahasildar, Tahasildar

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.4-Tahasildar, MoEF

FAC: Tamil Nadu Vs, MoEF, Deepak Kumar

WORK_OF_ART: Nature, 27.2.2012

ORDINAL: first

PERCENT: 15%