intel Corp. Vs. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jun-21-2004

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: Section 1782(a, Section 1782(a, National Defense Authorization Act, the EC Treaty, Section 1782, Section 1782(a, Title 28 of the U. S. C. Revisited, Constitution

ORG: Intel Corp., Advanced Micro Devices, INTEL CORP, V. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, SUPREME COURT, ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC, the united states court of appeals, the Commission on International Rules of Judicial Procedure (Rules Commission, Congress, Emphasis, Respondent Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., AMD, Intel Corporation, Intel, the Directorate-General for Competition, the Commission of the European Communities (Commission, Intel, the DG-Competition, AMD, Intel, AMD, the District Court, Intel, The District Court, The Ninth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit, Commission, The Court of Appeals, Intel, AMD, the European Union, Commission, the Ninth Circuit, the District Court, AMD, Court, Commission, The DG-Competition’s, the Court of First Instance, the Court of Justice, the European Communities, European Court, the DG-Competition, the DG-Competition, Commission, Commission, the Court of First Instance, the European Court of Justice, Commission, the DG-Competition, Commission, Commission, Court, Intel, Commission, AMD, Court, Intel, Intel, Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., Commission, AMD, Commission, the Court of First Instance, the European Court of Justice, Commission, AMD, Commission, the Rules Commission’s, Congress, Court, Commission, Court, Intel, Commission, AMD, Congress, Congress, INS, Congress, Congress, Congress, Court, Intel, Court, Court, Intel, Commission, AMD, the District Court, Court, Intel, Intel, Court, Intel, Intel, AMD, Commission, AMD, Commission, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Intel, Court, Court, Intel Corp., Advanced Micro Devices, INTEL CORP, V. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC, INC, the united states court of appeals, Court, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., AMD, Intel Corporation, Intel, the Directorate-General for Competition of the Commission of the European Communities (European Commission or Commission, AMD, Intel, District Court, AMD, The Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit, the District Court, AMD, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, AMD, AMD, the European Commission, AMD, Commission, the District Court, Congress, Congress, Congress, Procedural Chaos, Congress, Commission on International Rules of Judicial Procedure (Rules Commission, Smit, International Litigation, Colum, Smit, International Litigation, Congress, the Rules Commission, Congress, Senate Report, Congress, Congress, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, AMD, Intel, AMD, the Directorate-General for Competition, the European Commission, The European Commission, the European Communities, Commission of European Communities, European Commission, Commission, the European Union, Consolidated Versions of Treaty on, European Union, Treaty Establishing European Community, EC Treaty, Commission, the European Union’s, European Commission, EC Treaty 64–65, AMD, Intel, AMD, Intel, Intergraph Corp., Intel Corp., Federal District Court, CA Fed, CA Fed, AMD, the District Court, Intel, Intergraph, AMD, the European Commission, The District Court, the Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit, The Court of Appeals, Letters Rogatory, Russian Federation, the Ninth Circuit, the European Commission’s, The European Commission, Commission, the Court of First Instance, European] Court of Justice, Commission, Commission, The Court of Appeals, Intel, AMD, AMD, the European Commission, Courts of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit, the Court of Appeals, Magistrate, AMD, AMD, the European Commission, The District Court, Intel, Order Vacating Hearing Date, C 01–7033 MISC JW, ND Cal., Intel, de novo, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, AMD, Crown Prosecution Serv, Ishihari Chemical Co., International Judicial Assistance (Letter Rogatory, the Ninth Circuit’s, the European Commission, the European Union’s, See European Commission, the Court of First Instance, European Union, the Court of Justice, the European Communities, European Court, Commission, the DG-Competition, European Commission, the DG-Competition, the DG-Competition, the European Commission, European Commission, Commission, the Court of First Instance, the European Court of Justice, Commission, Commission, See European Commission, Sigmon Coal Co., European Commission, Intel, Intel, AMD, Commission, Intel, Court, Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., American Trucking Assns, European Commission, the DG-Competition’s, Commission, the Court of First Instance, the European Court of Justice, Oral Arg, AMD, Commission, Congress, the Commission on International Rules of Judicial Procedure, the Rules Commission, The Rules Commission’s, Congress, Congress, Smit, International Litigation, the European Court of Justice, European] Commission, Commission, European Commission, Amicus Curiae, the European Commission, Intel, AMD, Commission, Congress, Congress, Congress, INS, Congress, Congress, Ishihara Chemical Co., Commission, Ministry of Legal Affairs of, Smit, International Litigation 1026, Congress, Application of Gianoli Aldunate, Pillars Enterprises Co., Avery Dennison Corp., Bayer AG, Congress, Senate, Intel, Reply Brief 5, Application of Asta Medica, Congress, House of Lords, Intel, Intel, the European Commission, AMD, the Court of First Instance, the European Court of Justice, Commission, European Union’s, Intel, Reply Brief 4a, Application of Ishihara Chemical Co., Ltd., Shipley Company, L.L.C., Pursuant, Reply Brief 4a, Senate, Intel, Application of Esses, Intel, Court, The European Commission, Court, the District Court’s, See European Commission, European Commission, Commission, the European Commission’s, Intel, AMD, the European Commission’s Leniency Program, European Commission, AMD, Commission, the District Court, Fed, Intel, the Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit, Footnote 1  , Procedural Chaos, Colum, Smit, International Litigation, the Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure, Uniform Interstate, the Commission on International Rules of Judicial Procedure, 3  See Smit, International Litigation, Congress, Intel, Intergraph, the Court of Appeals, the Federal Circuit, Intel, AMD, AMD, Commission, Intel, Intergraph, Intel, Intel, Intel, Intel, Application of Asta Medica, Ministry of Legal Affairs of, Amtsgericht Ingolstadt, Letter Rogatory, First Court of First Instance in Civil Matters, the Ninth Circuit, Application of Gianoli Aldunate, Bayer AG, The Court of First Instance, European] Court of Justice, European] Court of Justice, Commission, the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, the Federal Trade Commission, the European Commission’s, Intel, Intel, the European Commission’s, Commission, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALI, ALI, American Assistance to Litigation in Foreign and International Tribunals: Section, the Amsterdam District Court, Congress, AMD, European Commission, Oral Arg, Commission, AMD, Intel, Commission, Commission, Court, The European Commission’s, European Commission, European Commission, The District Court, the District Court, Pillars Enterprises Co., Avery Dennison Corp., Intel Corp., Advanced Micro Devices, SUPREME COURT, INC, the united states court of appeals, Court, Senate Committee Report, Senate, House, the Senate Report, Congress, Court, Intel Corp., Advanced Micro Devices, INTEL CORP, V. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC, SUPREME COURT, INC, the united states court of appeals, Court, Congress, A. Shapira & K. DeWitt-Arar, the British Housing Corporation, The Housing Corporation: Multiple Lines of Accountability, The Politics of Quasi-Government, M. Flinders & M. Smith, The Brookings Institution, Civil Litigation, Federal Judicial Center, Problems, non-“tribunal”-like, Congress, Congress, Commission on International Rules of Judicial Procedure, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Swift & Co., Congress, The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Fed, the Commission of the European Communities’ (Commission, Commission, the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, the Federal Trade Commission, Commission, Wils, The Combination of the Investigative and Prosecutorial Function, the Adjudicative Function, EC, the Commission’s Legal Service, European Commission, Commission, AMD, Commission, Commission, Commission, the European Convention on Human Rights, Commission, Court, the European Communities, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd., AMD, AMD, Commission, Commission, Commission, the European Communities, AMD, AMD, Court, Intel Corp., Court

DATE: 2004, 2003, April 20, 2004, June 21, 2004, 1964, 1964, 1964, 1964, 1964, 1996, 26(b)(2, 2004, 2004, June 21, 2004, nearly 150 years, 1855, Mar. 2, 1855, Mar. 3, 1863, 1948, June 25, 1948, 1782, The next year, May 24, 1949, 1953, 1958, Sept. 2, Pub, 1743, 2392, 1958, 1965, Six years later, 1964, 1782, Oct. 3, Pub, 1964, 1782, 4a–5a, 1580, 1964, 1052, 1963, 1996, Fiscal Year 1996, 104–106, 2002, October 2000, 33, 64–65, 67, 81, 2d 1255, Ala. 1998, 1999, 2d 1288, ND Ala. 2000, 2001, 15a, 2d 1216, 1218–1219, 1976, 1964, 1204, 2000, 1964, 1996, Nov. 30, 2003, 2003, CADC 1989, 2001, 1991, 2002, 24, 26–27, 1947, 1782, 2001, 1958, 1743, 1580, 71, 73, 1782, 1964, 1964, 1995, 1964, 1580, 1996, 1964, 1580, 1782, 2d, 2d 1151, 1155, 8–9, 1580, 1782, 59, 1993, 3d 1075, 1080, 2002, 1998, 1580, 2d 1, 6, CA1 1992, 1994, 1987, 24, 3d 1095,, 1102, 1995, 1101, 824–826, 2d ed. 2000, 1319, 1782, May 18, 2000, 1964, 1580, 1996, 1985, 26(b)(2, 1953, Rev. 1015, 1027, 1965, 1963, 72, 55, 2d 1, 7, CA1 1992, 2d 1151, 1156, 1996, 1995, 1993, 1998, 1994, 1964, 1782, 1696, 2004, 1018, 1019, 1998, 13, 1998, the 40 years, 3d 1075, 1080, 2002, 2004, 2004, 2004, 2004, June 21, 2004, today, 2004, 2004, June 21, 2004, 1995, 1999, 1989, 4, 8, 1997, 1782, today, Sept. 2, 1958, 1743, 1984, 1944, June 2004, 1782, today, 1985, 1973

ORDINAL: ninth, first, first, First, Second, ninth, first, first, 88th, 88th, First, Second, first, second, first, first, First, Second, First, Fourth, Second, ninth, ninth, First, Second, First, first, second

CARDINAL: 02–572, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 9–23, 1, 9–11, 2, 11–20, 1782(a, 1782, 529, 11–13, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 397, 1782(a, 14–15, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, two, 1782(a, 1782(a, 15–20, 3, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 20–23, 292, 542, 02, 1782(a, 1, 1782(a, 2, 1782(a, 3, 4, 140, 2, 10, 630, 95, 1, 12, 769, 1, 646, 62, 949, 1782, 139, 63, 103, 62, 2, 2d, 3, 65, 2, 9, 997, 6, 3, 2d, 7, 9, 1782(a, 486, 292, 665, 41, 1, 81, 325, 2, 82, 40–43, 3, 195, 88, 253, 111, 1782(a, 6, 292, 669, two, 1782(a, 667, 539, 1, 235, 4, one, 292, 667, 1782(a, 292, 668, 1782(a, 669, 1782(a, 1a–6a, 9, 1782(a, 1782(a, two, 1782(a, 1782(a, 870, 2d 686, 691, 251, 125, 936, 2d 702, 6, 7, 50, 2000, 5, 8, 7, 7, 52–53, 2000, 328–329, 51–53, 1782, 450, 1782(a, 9, 1782(a, 1782, 24, 529, 1782(a, 1782, 531, 482–483, 11, 10, 17, 2, 4, 1026–1027, 9, 1782(a, 292, 667, 11, 9, 4, 397, 9, 1782(a, 486, 4, 7, 251, 3d, 125, 1782(a, 870, 691, 848, 1782(a, 1782(a, 9, 1782, 3, Four, 308, 292, 669, 146, 193–194, 1782(a, 1782(a, 7, two, 981, 1782(a, 146, 194, 235–236, 12, 1782(a, 13, 1782(a, 51, 237, 51, 14, 15, 16, 17, 1782(a, 238, 1782(a, 1782(a, 1782(a, 7, 1782(a, 23, 1782(a, 27, 146, 196, 876, 1782(a, 140, 146–147, 1782(a, 17, 11–16, 1782(a, 1782(a, 11–16, 18, 1782(a, 16, 19, 62, 519, 65, 2, 1026–1027, 253, 3d, 699, 113, 55–56, 1782(a, 981, 848, 1782(a, 82, 592, 42, 310–311, 3, 146, 193–194, 9, 4, 10, 27, 20, 11, 12, 22, 73, 235, 1782, 13, 25, 1, 235–236, 94, 1782(a, 3, 3–6, 20–23, 33, 17, 2, 1782(a, 19–20, 1782(a, 5, 18, 14–15, 6, 19, 73, 6, 4, Four, 308, 02, 542, 02, 111, 114, 3–5, two, 2, 843, 134, 140, 1, 2, 27, 96, 27, 201, 207, 207, 13, 207–209, 2, 1782(a, 2, 8), 13, 15, 6, 4, 1782(a, 140, 146–147, 146, 437

GPE: the United States, Alabama, Pp., Pp., Pp., Pp., Pp., Pp., United States, the United States, the United States, United States, United States, the United States, Pp., the United States, the United States, Pp., Ginsburg, the United States, California, United States, the United States, the United States, United States, Alabama, the United States, California, Alabama, Tokyo, United States, California, United Kingdom, Federative Republic, Id., U. S., United Kingdom, Trinidad, United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, United States, the United States, United States, the United States, United Kingdom, United States, the United States, U. S., United States, the United States, United States, United States, Alabama, Alabama, California, Trinidad, Caracas, Venezuela, United States, the United States, Quangos, America, the United States, Id., the United States, the United States, United States

PERCENT: 28 U. S. C. §1782(a, 28 U. S. C. §1782(a, 110 Stat, 42 U. S. C. §7511(a, 110 Stat, 28 U. S. C. §1696(a, 542 U. S., 542 U. S., 28 U. S. C. §1782, 60%

NORP: European, European, amici, S., European, European, d., European, European, European, amici, European, American, American, American, American, British, American, American, British, American, European, American, American, American, American, American, Rules, American, American

LOC: the Northern District, the Northern District, the Northern District, the Northern District, Europe, Europe, the Northern District, Europe, Europe

FAC: the DG-Competition, the DG-Competition, the DG-Competition, Notre Dame L. Rev.

PERSON: sU., J., Rehnquist, C. J., Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Scalia, J., Breyer, J., J., Ginsburg, Jones, Yale L. J. 515, 85th Cong., H. R. Rep., Pub, App, App, Cert, Cert, Ibid, Circuits, Cert, n. 5, Whitman , Tobago , n. 9, n. 7, Assurantie Maatschappij, N. V. , S. A. v. R. Esmerian, L. Ritter, W. Braun, Decl, H. Smit, Misc, 99–232, Thomas , Cert, Rule Civ, Jones, Yale L. J. 515, R. Doc, 72–73, Tobago , F. R. G., 59–60, C. Kerse, Final Draft, Hazard, Cert, Scalia, Breyer, Mann, Mayer, Delay, T. Willging, J. Shapard, D. Milfich, Chevron U. S. A. Inc., Rule Civ, n. , Thomas , Dickerson

EVENT: the DG-Competition’s, World Competition Law and Economics Review

PRODUCT: 706, the DG-Competition, the DG-Competition, 1 App, Discovery, Discovery

WORK_OF_ART: [W]hen the Commission, DG Competition’s, Request for Assistance, Request for Assistance

QUANTITY: 35 S. Tex. L. Rev. 215, 101 F. 3d 873

LANGUAGE: English, English