Slack Vs. Mcdaniel - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Apr-26-2000

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: McDANIEL, Constitution, the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Roe

ORG: Slack, McDaniel, Syllabus, WARDEN, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, The Federal District Court, State, Ninth Circuit, The District Court, the District Court, Consistent with Circuit, CPC, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, The Ninth Circuit, § 2253(c)which, Justice, COA, Court, Congress, Pp, AEDPA, TVA, the District Court's, Zant, Martinez-Villareal, REHNQUIST, THOMAS, GINSBURG, STEVENS, BREYER, SOUTER, J., Solicitor General Waxman, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Rutherford Institute, the Attorneys General, the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, the Ninth Circuit, The District Court's, The Court of Appeals, District Court, United, Sons Co., Federal Rules, the Court of Appeals, Fed, the "Court, N]one, the Court of Appeals', Turner, the Courts of Appeals, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, CADC, Kunzman

GPE: U.S., Nevada, United States, Pp, the United States, the State of California et al, California, States, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, Washington, Prisons, Nev., pp, §, Id., Maine

DATE: 1999, October 4, 1999-Reargued, March 29, April 26, 2000, 1991, 2254, 1995, 1998, 2253, 1996, April 24, 1996, two years, JJ, 1994 ed., 1990, November 27, 1991, 1982, February 19, 1992, May 30, 1995, December 24, 1997, 1548, March 30, 1998, April 29, 1998, July 7, 1998, 1948, June 25, 1948, 1983, 1997, 1924, Apr. 30, 1991, 1009, 40-44, today, 1936, the three months, 1323, 1051-1052, F. 3d 430, 1363

CARDINAL: 98-6322, 14, 1, 2, 2253(c)(1, 2253(c, 327, 236, 241, 480, 483, 894, 434, 893, 4, two, 347, 484, 3, 485-490, 476, 487, 510, 520, 485-489, 489, II, 490, 478, 22, 98 F.3d, four, one, 197, 525, 62, 967, 481, 248, 96-8986, 8(f, 240, 485, 644, 137, 416, 420, 115, 201, 208, 101, 791, 98, 44, 45, 182, 699, 702, 151, 142, 18, 126, 431, 125

PERSON: Mter, Lundy, AEDPA, Lindh, Murphy, E. g., Hohn, Barefoot, Estelle, Williams, Taylor, McCleskey, Stewart, States, KENNEDY, J., C. J., Michael Pescetta, Timothy P. O'Toole, Matthew D. Roberts, Robinson, Dreeben, Vicki David F. Sarnowski, Frankie Sue Del Papa, Julie A. Slabaugh, Del Papa, Edward M. Chikofsky, Barbara E. Bergman, David M. Porter, John W Whitehead, Briefs, Bill Lockyer, David P. Druliner, Carol Wendelin Pollack, Donald E. De Nicola, A. Scott Hayward, Bill Pryor, Bruce M. Botelho, Janet Napolitano, Mark Pryor, M. Jane Brady, Robert A. Butterworth, Alan, G. Lance, Carla J. Stovall, Richard P. Ieyoub, Mike Moore, Jeremiah W, Nixon, Joseph P. Mazurek, Don Stenberg, Patricia A. Madrid, Michael F. Easley, Charles M. Condon, Mark Barnett, Paul, Mark L. Earley, S. Scheidegger, Supp, Antonio Slack, Rose, Nev. Dept, App, Farmer, A. Engelhard &, O. T. 1997, Rule App, Rule Civ, n. 4, MartinezVillareal, Carlson, Christy, Dickinson, Camarano, E. g., Rules Civ, Crowell

ORDINAL: second, first, First, Second, Third

WORK_OF_ART: Notice of Appeal

MONEY: 474, 475, 477, 483 III, 484, 486, 488, 489, 490 Opinion of SCALIA

NORP: d., amici, D.

PERCENT: 526 U. s., 28 U. S. C. § 2253(c, 28 U. S. C. § 2253, 28 U. S. C. § 2253 enacted, 28 U. S. C. §2254, 521 U. S., 482 States, 500 U. S., 28 U. S. C. § 2254(b)(2, 28 U. S. C. §2253

PRODUCT: Mackenzie, 101