Semantic Analysis by spaCy
MartIn Vs. Ohio
Decided On : Feb-25-1987
Court : US Supreme Court
LAW: the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Due Process Clause, The Ohio Code, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Revised Code, the Due Process Clause , the Fourteenth Amendment, Constitution, the Due Process Clause, the Fifth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, Constitution, Constitution
ORG: Martin, U.S. Supreme Court, THE SUPREME COURT OF, Syllabus, State, State, the Ohio Court of Appeals, Supreme Court, the State Supreme Court, State, State, State, Court, Court, J., Court, REHNQUIST, STEVENS, BRENNAN, Court, the State of Ohio, the Ohio Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, the State of New York, Court, State, State, State, Martin, Martin, Martin, State, Supreme Court, State, Martin, State, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, the Ohio Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, the Sixth Circuit, White v. Arn, State, the Ohio Supreme Court, State, State, Court, Martin, Martin, The Ohio Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Supp, Court, State, Court, Martin, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, Martin, State, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, State, State, Court, Court, the Ohio Supreme Court, Court, State, Court, State, Court, POWELL, State, Court, Martin, Martin, Martin, Court, State, Court, State
GPE: Ohio, U.S., Ohio, U.S., Ohio, U.S., Ohio, Ohio, New York, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, States, States, Pp, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, New York, Ohio, U.S., Ohio, New York, States, U.S., New York, Leland, Oregon, Rivera, Delaware, New York, Rivera, U.S., States, States, Ohio, New York, U.S., Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, U.S., States, States, Ohio, South Carolina, States, States, Ohio, Leland, Oregon, Rivera, Delaware, New York, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, New York, Ohio, New York, U.S., Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, States, States, U.S., Ohio, U.S., Pennsylvania, States, New York, U.S., Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, New York, Ohio, U.S., Pennsylvania
CARDINAL: 480, 480, 480, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, two, 21, 91, 488, 166, 230, one, 21, 91, 488, 166, 168, 1, 2, 3, 19, 2903.01, Five, six, three, three, 21, 488, 168, 475, 432, 432, one, 397, 21, 488, 168, 235, 788, 338, 346, 8, 12, 18, 455, 346, 432, Two, 77, 882, two, 2903.01, one, 125.20, 432, 788, 338, 344, one, 1, 2, 19, two, 3, 4, 5, 432, two, 432, at least two, 432, two, 19, 133, 249, 797, 1, 2, 58, 74, 388, 755, 758, 3, one, 4, 421
DATE: 1987, 1987, December 2, 1986, February 25, 1987, 93, 1986, 1982, July 21, 1983, 1977, 94, 1986, 1970, A few years later, 1952, 1976, 94, 1986, 1352, 1359-1360, 1982, this century, 1968, 1952, 1976, today, 1977, Today, 1982, 1977, today, 1975, 1987, 1986, 1970, 14, Today, today, 1975, today, Today, 1986, 1895, 1969, 1958, 1985, 79-80, 1979, 1986
PERSON: Martin v., Martin, Patterson, 480 U. S. 233 , Patterson, 480 U. S. 235 , POWELL, J., MARSHALL, J., 480 U. S. 236 , Earline Martin, Walter Martin, Petitioner, Martin, Patterson, Patterson, Martin, Patterson, Patterson, Patterson, Martin, Martin, Patterson, Morris, White v. Arn, Patterson, Patterson, Patterson, Patterson, Patterson, POWELL, MARSHALL, Martin, Patterson, Patterson, Patterson, Patterson, McKinney, White v. Arn, Patterson, Ante, Patterson, Martin, Patterson, Ante, Patterson, Patterson, Patterson, Mullaney, Wilbur, Mullaney, Patterson, Patterson, Mullaney, Patterson, Mullaney, Patterson, McMillan, J., Mullaney, Patterson, J., Mullaney, Beard v. United States, Nolton, Patterson, Speiser v. Randall, Francis v. Franklin, Robbins, Francis v. Franklin, McMillan
WORK_OF_ART: Due Process Clause, Due Process Clause, the Due Process Clause, Winship, The Due Process Clause, Winship
NORP: §, American, Anglo
FAC: L.J. 880
ORDINAL: First, Second, First, Second