Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Cftc Vs. Weintraub
Decided On : Apr-29-1985
Court : US Supreme Court
LAW: Weintraub No, The Bankruptcy Code, the Commodity Exchange Act, Chapter 7, the Bankruptcy Reform Act, Bankruptcy Code, Chapter 7, the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Code
ORG: CFTC, U.S. Supreme Court, CFTC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, CIRCUIT, Syllabus, Federal District Court, the Commodity Exchange Act, Chicago Discount Commodity Brokers, CDCB, CDCB, CDCB, CDCB, CDCB, CDCB, The District Court, Magistrate, the Court of Appeals, Congress, Court, Court, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Chicago Discount Commodity Brokers, CDCB, CDCB, Commission, Commission, CDCB, CDCB, Commission, The District Court, CDCB, The Bankruptcy Court, Notz, CDCB, Commission, CDCB, Commission, CDCB, CDCB, CDCB, Commission, Commission, CDCB, Notz, Notz, Commission, CDCB, Commission, Commission, Notz, Notz, Magistrate, CDCB, Notz, CDCB, Notz, Cert.19a-20a, The District Court , Magistrate, Notz, The District Court, CDCB, the District Court's, the Court of Appeals, the Seventh Circuit, Citibank, the Court of Appeals, Upjohn Co., Upjohn Co., Upjohn Co., Dodge, Ford Motor Co., N.W., Oral Arg, Citibank, Grand Jury Investigation, Diversified Industries, Inc., Meredith, the Courts of Appeals, Emphasis, Congress, Congress, B.R. 54, Congress, House, Senate, State, Page 471 U. S. 352 , Washington Group, Inc., §§ 521, Congress, U.S. 974, Page 471 U. S. 355 , Washington Group, Inc., VI Respondents', Congress, Notz, CDCB, the Court of Appeals, the Seventh Circuit, The Court of Appeals, CDCB, The Court of Appeals, CDCB, Notz, Citibank, the Court of Appeals', the Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit, the Seventh Circuit, N.Y.Bus, Model Bus.Corp.Act §, Legal Models of Management Structure, the Modern Corporation, Accountants
GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Pp, Pp, the United States, Notz, U.S., United States, United States, United States, United States, Weinfeld, pp, United States, U.S., pp, Browy, United States, Calif.
DATE: 1985, 1985, March 19, 1985 , April 29, 1985, October 27, 1980, 44, 47-48, October 27, 1980, April 26, 1982, June 9, 18a, 49, July 27, 17a, July 27, 1984, 1982, 1192, 1981, 1984, 1981, 1980, 1976, 1919, 1195, 1224, 1236, 1979, 1978, 70, 1981, 1982, ed.1985, 1978, 33999, 1978, 1977, 1979, 1979, 1213, 1980, 1981, ed.1985, 1977, CA7 1976, 1933, 1093, 1102-1103, 1970, 1971, 47, 1963, today, today, today, 1899, October 21, 1980, 1984, June 9, 1984, 1983, 35 (1979, 1975
PERSON: Weintraub, Frank McGhee, Respondent Weintraub, Weintraub, J., POWELL, J., MARSHALL, § 6d(1, Frank McGhee, John K. Notz, Subchapter IV of, Gary Weintraub, Weintraub, Weintraub, Weintraub, Weintraub, Weintraub, Weintraub, Frank McGhee, Andrew McGhee, Weintraub, Cert, McGhees, O. P. M. Leasing Services, N. A. v. Andros, Trammel, Fisher, O. P. M. Leasing Services, Andros, Subject, O. P. M. Leasing, Edwards, DeConcini, H.R.Rep, Butner, Johnston v. Gilbert, Clark v. United States, Garner, Wolfinbarger, Clark, Ducker, Wolf, Weinstein, McDonald v. Williams, POWELL, Andrew McGhee, Frank McGhee, Weintraub, O. P. M. Leasing, O. P. M. Leasing, Frank McGhee, Andros, Boileau, Code Ann., Tit, McKinney, Eisenberg, Directors, Andrew McGhee, Frank McGhee
CARDINAL: 471, 84, 471, 722, 338, 345, 1, 7, 11, 761, 23, 49, 7, 1, 2, 722, 338, two, 670, 383, 666, 3, 469, 204, 507, 170, 684, 26, 386, 599, 572, 596, 611, 5, 5, 11, 13, 670, 383, 4, 124, 32400, 95, 84, 95, 369-370, 11, 541, 1106(a)(1, 476, 246, 250, 636, 452, 1106(a)(3, 548, 721, 2, 343, 95, 220-221, 6, 11, 547, 548, one, 527, 799, 802, 430, 401, 11, 11, 22, 476, 250, 134, One, 11, one, two, 1, 2, 37, 722, 343, 722, 342, 43, 1, 722, 338, 339, 5, 2, 3, 722, 341, 736, 503, 4, 8, 141, 63, 375, 5, 1, 6
NORP: § 542(e, §, §, §, §, §, §, F.Supp, §, §, §, §, F.Supp, §
PERCENT: 471 U. S. 349 , 471 U. S. 352, 471 U. S. 354 , 445 U. S. 40
LOC: the Northern District
WORK_OF_ART: Circuits
ORDINAL: First, 15th, 15th, First, Second, First, Second
MONEY: 363(c)(1