Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

California Vs. Trombetta

Decided On : Jun-11-1984

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: the Federal Constitution, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Due Process Clause, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Due Process Clause, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, Constitution, the Due Process Clause, the Federal Constitution, Constitution, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Due Process Clause, the Federal Constitution

GPE: California, California, California, U.S., CALIFORNIA, California, California, California, Maryland, California, States, United States v., Maryland, California, California, California, California, U.S., United States, Maryland, U.S., United States v., U.S., United States, United States, United States, United States, United States, U.S., United States, United States, F.B.I., United States, California, California, Maryland, United States, California, States, United States v. Agurs, U.S., California, California, California, California, Cf., Michigan, California, Maryland, United States, United States, California, Alaska, Washington, Texas, California, United States, Virginia, California, Alaska, United States

ORG: U.S. 479, U.S. Supreme Court, Trombetta, U.S. 479, the Municipal Court, the California Court of Appeal, State, State, Court, Court, State, State, Municipal Court, Berry, Berry, the California Court of Appeal, Respondents Trombetta, the Municipal Court, the Court of Appeal, Ward, The California Court of Appeal, the California Supreme Court's, the Court of Appeal, Ward, State, the California Supreme Court, Court, Court, Valenzuela-Bernal, the Federal Government, Government, Valenzuela-Bernal, Government, Valenzuela-Bernal, the California Court of Appeal, State, Government, Government, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Court, the California Court of Appeal, State, the California Department of Health, Department, California Public Defender's Association, the California Court of Appeal, the State's Department of Health, Department, Breath Alcohol Analysis, The California Department of Health, Kit, the California Department of Health, the California Department of Health, The California Court of Appeal, Trombetta, Cox, the Court of Appeal, Court, Clifford, , Court, the California Supreme Court, State, the Preservation of Evidence Doctrine, Colum, Court of Appeal, The Court of Appeal, Trombetta, the Indium Tube Kit, State, Fourteenth Amendments, the California Court of Appeal's, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the Department of Transportation, Fed, State, State, State, Augenblick, Court

DATE: 1984, 1984, April 18, 1984, June 11, 1984, 427 U. S. 97, 1976, 1963, weekly, 1983, 1980, 1981, West 1971, 1981, 23102, West 1971, 1981, 1974, 1984, 1982, 1959, 1935, 1972, 1957, 1971, 1977, 1961, 1001, weekly, 1976, Dec. 20, 1979, § 13353, West 1971, 1983, under 28, 1984, 1963, 1972, 1355, 1364-1368, 1975, D.C. 132, 1971, a number of years, 1975, 1974, 1967, 427 U. S. 97, 1976, 1972, 30459, 1973, 1975, 1979, West 1971, 1983, 1976, 1982, 1969

CARDINAL: 467, 83, 467, 485, 138, 319, 1, 0.00, Two, two, 0.02, zero, 138, 141, 190, 319, 321, 2, 23126(a)(3, 3, 4, 142, 141-142, 190, 12, 527, 361, 144, 323, 5, two, 464, 373, 427, 17, 6, 458, One, 18, 242, 427, 9, two, 10, 32-34, 25-40, only two, 12, 1, 17, 238-247, 6, 2, 3, 247, three, 142, 138, 142, 190, 319, 321, 242, 18, 4, 142, 140, 143, 320, 323, 144, 323, 644, 527, 363, 150, 12, 645-650, 527, 364, 75, 142, 141, 439, 642, 651, 52, 666, 125, 341, 3, 142, 143, 322, 6, 5, 8, 9, 38, 10, 2, three, 13353.5, 12, 548, 107, 118, 318, 383

PRODUCT: Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, 320-321, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, App, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Trombetta, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer

WORK_OF_ART: The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Intoxilyzer

PERSON: Brady, J., J., MARSHALL, Brady, Cox, People v. Hitch, Berry, Napue v. Illinois, Mooney v. Holohan, Brady, Giglio, Roviaro, Lovasco, Brady, al, Kit, Kit, Cox, Brady, Giglio, Brady, Wright, People v. Miller, Miller, Davis, Moore, Reg, A. Flores, Jackson, Lauderdale v. State

TIME: several seconds

PERCENT: 0.10 percent, 0.10 percent, 458 U. S. 858 , 458 U. S. 867 , 294 U. S., 415 U. S. 308 , 393 U. S. 348

NORP: Berry, Killian, Killian, Killian, Killian, Killian, amici, Amici, Hitch

FAC: Intoxilyzer, Intoxilyzer

QUANTITY: 12 Cal.3d

ORDINAL: Sixth, First, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //