White Vs. Estelle

Decided On : Jan-01-1983

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: the Due Process Clause, the Fifth Amendment

ORG: WHITE, U.S. 1118, U.S. Supreme Court, WHITE, ESTELLE, U.S. 1118, Texas Department of Corrections, the United States Court of Appeals, the Fifth Circuit, The Court of Appeals, Page 459 U.S. 1118, White, White, White, White, White, White, White, Page 459 U.S. 1118, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, White, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the District Court, The Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, Court, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, Page 459 U.S. 1118 ,, Pate, Page 459 U.S. 1118, the United States Constitution, U.S. 72, U.S. 443, the District Court, Page 459 U.S. 1118, the District Court, Court, Page 459 U.S. 1118, Court, Court, Court, Court, Page 459 U.S. 1118 ,, Burger, the District Court, Court, U.S. 402, The State of Texas, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art, Federal District Court, Federal District Court, Wright & Sofaer, Yale L.J. 895, the Law-Federal Habeas Corpus

DATE: 1983, 1983, 1118, January 10, 1983, January 12, 1975, June 28, 1975, September 3, 1976, 1119, January 1977, 1120, January 5, 1977, 1975, 1979, 1121, 1975, 1966, 1122, 87, 2506, 1977, 2254(d, 1963, 1953, 1981, 1123, 1975, 1961, 1124, 1979, 2783, 1071, 1970, 1125, 1126, 1958, 1960, 46. 02, 1714-15, 1980, 1240-41d, 1977, 1953, 1949, 1963, 1963, 1966, 1038, 1135-1137, 1970

CARDINAL: 459, 459, 81, three, 1, at least seven, two, 69-75, One, two, 591, 851, 854, 420, 162, 896, 174, 10, 10, 669, 973, 976, 443, 307, 443, 319, 420, 383, 375, 420, 171.2, 420, 175, 10, 10, 3, 433, 28, 372, 293, 309, 6, 755, 6, 344, 506, 445, 449, 539, 372, 312, 316, 758, 28, 2254(d)(8, 314, 372, 313, 318, 759, 420, 372, 315, 365, 534, 540, 546, 739, 742, 420, 163, 178, 175, 175, 10, 10, 179, 443, 307, 309, 99, 326, 397, 361, 443, 319, 459, 318, 254, 725, 730, 356, 1, 46.02, 2, 362, 402, 788, 788, 3, 446, 335, 341, 430, 387, 401, 344, 443, 338, 49, 51-52, 4, 372, 293, 314, 758, 315, one, 315, 5, 372, 293, 314, 75, 935

GPE: U.S., Jr., the United States, Lubbock County, Tex., the United States, Texas, Drope, Missouri, U.S., Drope, Jackson, Virginia, U.S., Drope, Missouri, U.S., U.S., Drope, Missouri, U.S., Drope, Missouri, U.S., U.S., Frankfurter, U.S., U.S., U.S., Drope, Missouri, U.S., U.S., Richmond, U.S., Drope, U.S., Id., Id., Drope, Drope, Virginia, U.S., U.S., Drope, Missouri, Townsend, Lyles, United States, Prettyman, U.S., United States, U.S., U.S., U.S., Watts, Indiana, U.S., Frankfurter, U.S., Id., Id., U.S.

PERSON: Robert Lee WHITE, W.J. ESTELLE, MARSHALL, Robert Lee White, White, White, White, ROBERT LEE WHITE, White v. State, 95 S. Ct, Jackson, Robinson, Sykes, Brown v. Allen, Sumner v. Mata, Rogers, Jackson, Jackson, J., Jackson, White, Dusky, 80 S. Ct, Cuyler, Sullivan, Brewer, Williams, Brown v. Allen

FAC: the Southwest Center for Psychological and Vocational Testing

LOC: White, the Northern District

NORP: d., d., d., d.

PRODUCT: Winship, Crim