Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bearden Vs. Georgia

Decided On : May-24-1983

Court : US Supreme Court

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Due Process Clause, Prop.Off, the Fourteenth Amendment, Prop. Off, the Due Process or Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, the Eighth Amendment

GPE: Bearden, Georgia, U.S., Bearden, Georgia, U.S., Bearden, Georgia, U.S., Georgia, U.S., Griffin, Griffin, California, Chicago, United States, Griffin, Illinois, Griffin, Illinois, Harlan, Illinois, Harlan, Illinois, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., Redhail, New York, U.S., Illinois, Georgia, Morrissey, U.S., U.S., U.S., Georgia, Morrissey, North Carolina, Texas, California, U.S., United States, United States, United States, Ill., Georgia, Illinois

DATE: 1983, 1983, 81-6633, January 11, 1983, May 24, 1983, that day, the next day, four months, about a month later, September, 1980, October 8, 1980, 27-2727, three years, one year, that day, the next day, four months, About a month later, February, 1981, May, 1981, 1982, quarter-century ago, 1956, 1963, 1967, 1971, 1970, 1971, 1974, 1976, 101 days, 1971, 1970, today, today, 1962, 411 U. S. 778, 1973, 1978, 15 (1949, 1981, 1972, 21, 45, May 10, 1981, 1975, five years, 3-year, 1980, 1977, 1978, 467, 1974, 1972, 1970, 1971, 1971, 1972, 1972, 411 U. S. 778, 1973, 1973, Today, 1969, 1968, 1962, 1979, 1972, 1963, 1007-1009, 1119, 1974, 1978, 1962, 1973, 1978, 1304, 38, 1005-6-4(d, 1981, 1970, 1972, daily, 1981, 1970, 1971

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, the Georgia First Offender's Act, State, The Georgia Court of Appeals, the Equal Protection Clause of, The Georgia Supreme Court, State, State, State, State, State, State, 288 S.E.2d 662, Court, BRENNAN, WHITE, J., BURGER, C.J., POWELL, REHNQUIST, Court, State, the Georgia Court of Appeals, the Georgia First Offender's Act, State, The Georgia Court of Appeals, Georgia Supreme Court, the Equal Protection Clause of, The Georgia Supreme Court, the Equal Protection Page 461 U. S. 664 Clause, Court, State, State, Court, MacCollum, Court, Justice Harlan, State, State, the Equal Protection Clause, State, the Equal Protection Page 461 U. S. 666 Clause, State, Harlan, Court, State, Schoonfield, State, State, Court, Court, State, ALI, State, POWELL, State, State, State, Harlan, WHITE, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, the Georgia Supreme Court, State, Court, State, State, State, State, the Court of Appeals, State, Calhoun v. Couch, State, State, De Bonis, N.J. 182, State, Boswell, Wilson, State, ALI, National Advisory Commission on, National Conference of Commissioners, State, Criminal Arrest, State, Court, Court, State, State, WHITE, Court, State, Court, the Equal Protection Clause, Court, Court, Harlan

CARDINAL: 461, 461, 401, 161, 640, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 458, 12, 401, one, 8, 399, 401, 401, 399, 401, 9, 10, 399, three, 399, 401, 399, 12, 13, one, 1, 2, two, 1, 3, 134, 244, 214, 179, 4, 245, 835, 268, 330, 240, 214, 239, 232, 207, 6, 457, 726, 473, 999, 52, 601, 483, 191, 58, 276, 137, 56, 286, 201, 778, 8, 9, 399, 242, 10, 605, 171, 469, 368, 321, 339, 115, 473, 55, 632, 525, 83, 790, 800, 266, 403, 408, 2d, 3, 3, 17, 35, 476, 12, 13, 5, 12, 401

MONEY: 500, 250, 100, 100, 550, 200, 550, 500, 250, 100, 100, 550, 200, 5, 550, 200, 50, 500, 3 Cal.3d 100, 3 Cal.3d

ORDINAL: first, first, ninth, first, First, Second, Third, first

PERCENT: 461 U. S. 664, 461 U. S. 664 , 461 U. S. 669, 461 U. S. 672 , 389 U. S. 40 , 426 U. S. 317

PERSON: Williams, Tate, J., MARSHALL, BLACKMUN, STEVENS, Douglas, Roberts, LaVallee, Mayer, Williams, Williams, Tate, Ross, Williams, Ross, Williams, Tate, Williams, Williams, Tate, Williams, Tate, Morris, Williams, Williams, Tate, Tate, Williams, Tate, Williams, Tate, Draft, Gagnon, Scarpelli, Zablocki, J., Williams, Williams, Williams, Wood, Gagnon, Scarpelli, Williams, Tate, Harlan, Williams, Williams, Williams, Tate, Radcliff, Stephens, Hunter, Dean, Frazier v. Jordan, Pedersen v. Blessinger, Gagnon, Scarpelli, Douglas, Buder, Powell, Robinson, Williams, Taylor, Huggett, Huggett, ABA Standards for, Draft, Tit, M. Wolfgang R. Figlio, Williams, Tate, POWELL, REHNQUIST, Williams, Tate, Williams

NORP: Procrustean

PRODUCT: Accord

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //