Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Boag Vs. Macdougall
Decided On : Jan-11-1982
Court : US Supreme Court
LAW: Constitution, Constitutional
ORG: Boag, U.S. Supreme Court, MacDougall, U.S. 364, U.S. 364, THE NINTH CIRCUIT, Syllabus, Federal District Court, The District Court, The Court of Appeals, The Court of Appeals', the Arizona Department of Corrections Reception and Treatment Center, The District Court, the Court of Appeals, the District Court's, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals', McDonnell, the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, Court, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, the District Court, the District Court, the District Court, Court, the District Court, Court, the District Court, Court, Court, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, Court, Phoenix Division, the District Court, the District Court, Wells, the District Court, Court, New York Telephone Co., Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Court, the national rights & uniformity, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the American Bar Association, R. Stern & E. Gressman, Supreme Court
CARDINAL: MacDougall, 454, 80-6845, 454, 642, 455, 642, 455, a dozen, 28, 28, two, 28, 42, seven, at least 10, at least 2, 159, 6, one, one, 28, 258
DATE: 1982, 1982, January 11, 1982, March 3, 1980, a week later, 1981, 1972, 1974, 1983, 1943, 1977, 1970, 1941, Sept. 7, 1949
PRODUCT: Boag, 397 U. S. 471
PERSON: Boag, Haines, Certiorari, Wolff, REHNQUIST, REHNQUIST, Dandridge, Williams, Ryerson, Vinson, John Rutledge, Vinson
GPE: the United States, Arizona, the United States, Arizona, the United States, Arizona, United States, United States, United States, South Carolina, the United States
ORDINAL: first, second, first, second, first, First, Second, first, 5th
WORK_OF_ART: Form To Be Used By Prisoner In Filing a Complaint Under The Civil Rights Act, Previous Lawsuits
EVENT: the Constitutional Convention
NORP: Judgmts