Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

General Tel. Co. Vs. Falcon

Decided On : Jun-14-1982

Court : US Supreme Court

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, Title VII, Rule 23, Rule 23(a, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, Rule 23, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, Rule 23, Title VII, Title VII, Rule 23, Title VII, Rule 23(a, Rule 23(a, Title VII, Title VII, Rule 23(a, Rule 23, Rule 23, the Rule 23(a, Rule 23(a, Rule 23, Rule 23(a, Title VII, Rule 23, Rule 23, Rule 23, Rule 23, Title VII

PERSON: Tel, Tel, J., BLACKMUN, STEVENS, Johnson, Cert, Rule Civ, Livesay, Mercantile Nat, Langdeau, Johnson, Godbold, MARIANO S. FALCON, Cert, Burdine , Cert, Rule Civ, Ante

ORG: Falcon, U.S. Supreme Court, Falcon, General Telephone Company of the Southwest, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Commission, Federal District Court, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, the District Court's, the Fifth Circuit's, the Court of Appeals, the District Court's, Court, the Court of Appeals', Texas Dept, Community Affairs v., The Court of Appeals, the District Court's, The District Court, Pp, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a, General Telephone Co., EEOC, the Fifth Circuit's, the District Court, the District Court's, American Pipe Construction Co., The District Court's, Court, BRENNAN, WHITE, POWELL, REHNQUIST, BURGER, C.J., Court, Falcon, Falcon, Falcon, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Falcon, General Telephone Co. of Southwest, Commission, Supp, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY, United States Court of Appeals, the Fifth Circuit, Georgia Highway Express, the District Court, the District Court, The District Court, Irving, the District Court, the Irving Page, Falcon, The Court of Appeals, the Fifth Circuit's, Payne, Page, Travenol Laboratories, Inc., U.S. 835, the Fifth Circuit, the Court of Appeals, the District Court's, Court, Texas Dept, Community Affairs v., the Court of Appeals, General Telephone Co. of, Falcon, Fifth Circuit, the District Court's, the District Court, Califano v. Yamasaki, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Commission, General Telephone Co., Northwest v. EEOC, Inc., Rodriguez,, Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee, East Texas Motor Freight, the Fifth Circuit, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, the Fifth Circuit's, Fed, Irving, the District Court, Congress, the District Court, the District Court's, American Pipe & Construction Co., The District Court's, Coopers & Lybrand v., Bank, Fifth Circuit, Georgia Highway Express, the Court of Appeals, Defendant, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, General Telephone Company, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Irving Division, Plaintiff, The District Court, The District Court, Irving, the District Court, The Court of Appeals, the District Court, Falcon, General Telephone Co. of Southwest, The District Court, The Court of Appeals, McDonnell Douglas Corp., Green, the District Court's, the Court of Appeals, Texas Dept, Community Affairs, The Court of Appeals, the District Court, the District Court's, the Court of Appeals, Werthan Bag Corp., See General Telephone Co., Northwest v. EEOC, East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc., Rodriguez,, BURGER, Court, the Court of Appeals, Court, Califano v. Yamasaki, East Texas Motor Freight System, Rodriguez,, General Telephone Co., Northwest v. EEOC, East Texas Motor Freight, Court, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, Falcon, General Telephone Company of Southwest, Falcon

GPE: U.S., U.S., Pp, Pp, Utah, the United States, Texas, Irving, Texas, Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas, U.S., U.S., Utah, U.S., Burdine, Dallas, Fort Worth, MD

DATE: 1982, 1982, April 26, 1982, June 14, 1982, 1964, 1969, July, 1969, a year, October, 1972, 1980, April, 1975, 1964, 2000e, 1976, 1122, 1969, 35a, 37a, the period, 1973, October 18, 1976, 1978, 1036, 1981, 1964, 1125-1127, 1125, 1126, 1127, today, 14, February 2, 1976, only 90 days, 90 days, 1978, 1980, 1979, 1972 and 1973, 39a, the years 1973 through 1976, 1979, 1977, 1980, between 1972 and 1976, 1980, years

CARDINAL: 457, 81, 457, 647, 633, 149, 626, 369, 372, 2, 78, 253, 42, 1, 2, 3, 46-47, 417, 5, 39a-40a, 6, 13, 8, one, 626, 375, 9, 565, 895, 439, 565, 626, 375, 10, 450, 647, 633, 42, 2000e-5(f)(1, three, 431, 12, 23, 12, 13, 1, 2, 3, 14, one, 15, 160, 16, 437, 11, 417, 1, 15, 13, 23, One, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 13-14, 14, 4, 26, 8, 34, 5, 6, 41a-45a, 463, 315, 8, 626, 369, 376, 9, 375-376, 10, 608, 563, 7, 626, 380, 12, 251, 184, 186, 13, 14, 4, 15, 16, one, 9, 160, 626, 369, 372, 381, 16, 373, 4

NORP: Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, American, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, American, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, American, Mexican, Americans, Mexican, Mexican, American, Mexican, Mexican, Travenol, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, F.Supp, Mexican, Mexican, F.Supp, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Mexican, Americans, Mexican

PERCENT: 457 U. S., 446 U. S. 318 , 457 U. S., 457 U. S. 157 , 457 U. S., 446 U. S. 318 , 446 U. S. 318 , 446 U. S. 318 , 7.7%, 5.2%

ORDINAL: first, first

LOC: the Northern District

TIME: hourly

MONEY: 67,925.49, 1,040.33, 28,827.50

WORK_OF_ART: Plaintiff and Defendant

LANGUAGE: Mexican

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //