Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Connecticut Vs. Teal

Decided On : Jun-21-1982

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII, Title VII

GPE: Connecticut, Connecticut, Connecticut, Connecticut, the State of, Connecticut, the United States, Connecticut, U.S., Negroes, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., The United States, U.S., U.S., United States, U.S., U.S., United States, U.S., U.S., United States, United States, U.S., Los Angeles, U.S., United States, United States, San Francisco, U.S., United States, U.S.

CARDINAL: 457, 457, 457, 48, 259, 451, 645, 133, 1, Four, 329, 48, 259, 3, 4, four, two, two, 5, 11, 35, 48, 259, 6, one, 645, 133, 138, 454, 2, 255, 42, two, two, 401, three, 401, 8, 9, 401, 401, 401, 422, 8, 10, 118, 10, 92-238, 17, 117, 10, only 12, 12, 422, one, 451, 267, 42, 2000e-2(h, 401, 110, 401, 12, 78, 255, 42, 2000e-3(a, 110, 20, 438, 401, 401, 411, 1, 78, 253, 42, 2, four, 645, 133, 135, 3, 3, 6.7, 135, 4, 4, 26, 54.17, 79.54, 15, 9 60.00, 329, 2, 29, 5, 6, 8, 86, 103, 86, 103, 92-415, 5, 92-238, 8, 118, 9, 42, 10, 92-238, 17, 92 415, 10, 118, Two, three, 118, 1, 12, 29, 29, 29, 42, 42, 401, two, 15, 2/1, 2/2, only 13, two, one, 2/3, 2/4, one, 635, 188, 192, 2/5, 433, 2/6, 462, only one, one, 2/7, 438, 2/8, 474, 2/1, 15, 2/2, two, 401, 2/3, at least one, 2/4, 5, 300.103(c, 2/5, 635, 188, 593, 988, 588, 568, 558, 520, 492, 497, 426, 483, 335, 474, 456, 756, 2/6, two, 440, one, 2/7, 431, 20, 13, 446, 423, 427, 10, 431, 873, 876, only one, 2/8, one

DATE: 1982, 1982, March 29, 1982, June 21, 1982, 1964, 1964, almost two years, December 2, 1978, March, 1979, 65, April, 1979, More than a year, approximately one month, 18a, 1971, 1975, 1977, 22a-24a, 26a, 1981, 1981, 1965, 1973, 1972, 1972, 9215, 1971, 1815, 1972, 9215, 1971, 31961, 1971, 1977, 1979, 11 (1982, 12723, 1964, 1964, 1978, 1977, 1976, 1978, 1971, 1964, 2000e, 1976, 1981, 65, 4 3, 18a, 23a, 1981, 1972, today, 1971, 1971, 1972, 1972, 1971, 1971, 1815-1819, 1972, 1969, 1817, 1972, 1607, 1981, 1981, 38291, 1978, 1981, 1979, 2000e, 1976, today, 1971, 1978, 1977, 1980, 1977, today, 1978, 1971, today, Today, 1981, today, today, 1256, 1263, today, 1977, 1977, 1975, 1971, 1981, 1981, 1980, 1979, 61, 66, 1978, 1977, 1975, 1976, 1256, 1975, 1979, 1974, 1977

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. 440, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, THE SECOND CIRCUIT Syllabus Respondent, Federal District Court, The District Court, The Court of Appeals, the District Court, Page 457 U. S. 441 , Pp, Congress, Pp, Court, WHITE, BURGER, C.J., REHNQUIST, Court, the Department of Income Maintenance of the State of Connecticut, the State of Connecticut, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, Duke Power Co., Albemarle Paper Co., Moody, , The United States Court of Appeals, the Second Circuit, the District Court, The Court of Appeals, Duke Power Co., the Duke Power Co., Court, Albemarle Paper Co., Congress, McDonnell-Douglas Corp., Green, Congress, Emphasis, Congress, Albemarle Paper Co., Moody, Congress, Congress, Congress, The Committee Reports, Congress, Court, Court, Albemarle Paper Co., Moody, New York Transit Authority, Beazer, the District Court's, the District Court's, Government, Congress, Court, Senate, American Tobacco Co., Court, Furnco Construction Corp., Teamsters, Furnco Construction Corp., Duke Power Co., McDonald, Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co., Congress, Water & Power, Martin Marietta Corp., Manhart, Teamsters, Duke Power Co., McDonnell Douglas Corp., Green, the Court of Appeals, the Second Circuit, the District Court, Supp, Receiving Rate Group Number Passing Score, District Court's, the ", the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, CFR § 1607.4D, Congress, Court, House, Senate, Senate, Houses, Congress, 703(a)(1, Houses, Senate, the United States Commission on Civil Rights, Commission, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, State, Local Government Employment, the Department of Justice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC, EEOC, the EEOC Guidelines, Guidelines, CFR, EEOC, the Office of Personnel Management, the Department of Labor, the Department of Justice, CFR §, Guidelines, Emphasis, Fed, CFR, Adoption of Questions and Answers, Clarify, EEOC, Fed, JUSTICE, Court, Supp, Duke Power Co., Court, Court, Court, Furnco Construction Corp., Teamsters, Court, Page 457 U. S. 459 , Court, the Court of Appeals, the Third Circuit, EEOC, Greyhound Lines, Inc., Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Water & Power, Phillips, Martin Marietta Corp., Court, Community Affairs v., Court, Court, Court, New Haven Civil Service Board, Teamsters, Albemarle Paper Co., Moody, , Duke Power Co., Court, Congress, Community Affairs v., Court, EEOC, Greyhound Lines, Inc., EEOC, Navajo Refining Co., Friend, Leidinger, Rule v. International Assn, U.S. 934, New Haven Civil Service Board, Court, Court, Albemarle Paper Co., Moody, , Court, Court, Court, New York Transit Authority, Beazer, Court, Court, Court, Court, Teamsters, Philadelphia v. Educational Equality League, District Court's, Panel, Diamond Shamrock Chemical Co., Washington Hospital Center, Court, Court

PERSON: Teal, J., BLACKMUN, STEVENS, POWELL, J., Winnie Teal, Rose Walker, Edith Latney, Grace Clark, Cert, Griggs, Dothard v. Rawlinson, Cert, Griggs, Griggs, Griggs, Dothard, Dothard v. Rawlinson, Griggs, Griggs, Griggs, Griggs, Cong, Williams, H.R.Rep, Perkins, Dothard v. Rawlinson, Griggs, Patterson, Humphrey, Griggs, Clark, Williams, Griggs, Phillips, Furnco, Phillips, Griggs, Cert, Griggs, H.R.Rep, Cong, Williams, Williams, S.Rep, Cong, Cong, Reg, Reg, POWELL, REHNQUIST, Griggs, Griggs, J., Dothard v. Rawlinson, Ante, Dothard, T]o, Furnco, Furnco, Newman, Brown, Dothard v. Rawlinson, Griggs, Teamsters, Smith, Troyan, Williams, Brown, Lee v. City of, Beazer, Beazer, Rogillio, Dendy

FAC: U.S. 440

ORDINAL: first, first

PERCENT: Fifty-four percent, approximately 68 percent, 22.9 percent, only 13.5 percent, 457 U. S. 445, 457 U. S. 445, 457 U. S., 457 U. S., 457 U. S. 456 , 54.17 percent, approximately 68 percent, 22.9 percent, 13.5 percent, 401 U. S. 424 , 36.89 percent, 9 percent, 440 U. S. 568 , 427 U. S. 273 , 435 U. S. 702 , 75 to 80 percent, 70.4 percent, eighty percent, 80 percent, close to 170 percent, 401 U. S. 424 , 22.9%, 5%, 36.89 percent, only 12.9 percent, 435 U. S. 702 , 401 U. S. 424 , 440 U. S. 568

NORP: §, §, §, §, §, amici, amici, §, Hispanic, §, §, F.Supp, F.Supp, F.Supp, F.Supp, Hispanics, F.Supp, F.Supp

QUANTITY: Forty-six

EVENT: U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(2, the Civil Rights Act, U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(2

WORK_OF_ART: Griggs, Griggs, Griggs, Griggs

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //