Marshall Vs. Jerrico, Inc. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Apr-28-1980

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, the Due Process Clause, the Administrative Procedure Act

PERSON: Marshall, appellee, Appellee, Tumey, Ward, Monroeville, MARSHALL, J., Reg, Appellee Jerrico, Carey, Mathews, Joint Anti-Fascist Committee, Frankfurter, Taylor, Hayes, H.R.Rep, 75th Cong., S.Rep, 75th Cong, Linda R.S. v., Richard D., Vaca, Ward v. Village, Hortonville Ed, Berger, Dunlop, Bachowski, 2 K. Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, Bordenkircher, Supp, Gibson v. Berryhill, Connally, Dugan, Withrow, Larkin, Mayberry, Gibson v Berryhill, Adams v. Richardson, Stewart, Jaffe

ORG: Jerrico, U.S. Supreme Court, Jerrico, Inc., Jerrico, Inc. No, Syllabus, the Employment Standards Administration, ESA, the Department of Labor, Federal District Court, The District Court, Pp, Court, Labor, Fed, appellee, appellee and representatives of, the Office of Administrative Law Judges, Page 446 U. S. 242, State, Offutt, CFR § 570.101, Congress, CFR, the District Court, Treasury, the Office of the Solicitor of Labor, Moog Industries, Inc., FTC, Rochester Telephone Corp., The District Court's, CFR § 579.5(c, the United States Government, Budget of the United States Government, The Office of Administrative Law Judges, Office, D.C. 267, Environmental Defense Fund, Ruckelshaus, SEC, D.C. 226, Perez v. Boston Housing Authority

CARDINAL: 446, 79, 16(e, 29, 12, 52, 212, 36, approximately 40, over 150, 1, 444, two, 273, 409, 2, 11, 133, 203(1, 217, 93-913, 15, 5, 554, 580.32(a, 3, 4, 9a, 6, 8, 9, 580.3(b, 10, 193, 7, 2d, 28, 528, 13, 14, 48, 582, 322, 73d, 652, 623, 510, 579.5, 156, 480, 142, 439, 584, 139, 432, 659, 404, 379, 400, 25, 485

GPE: U.S., Ohio, Delaware, Kentucky, Indiana, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, Atlanta, Monroeville, United States, the United States, Hortonville, Pennsylvania, Morrissey, Chicago, Denver, Mass., Iowa

DATE: 1980, March 19, 1980, April 28, 1980, 1067, 1971, 1969 to 1975, 1927, 1972, 1979, 1978, 1976, 1951, 1954, 1955, 1974, 1452, 6 (1937, 15 days, 1934, the years 1976, 1977, all three years, each of those years, 1977, 1973, 1958, 1967, 1975, 5332, 1928, the only year, any given year, the end of the fiscal year, Fiscal Year 1980, Fiscal Year 1979, Fiscal Year 1978, that year, 1159, D.C. 74, 1970, 703, 1231, 1247, 1252-1253, 1667, 1752-1756, a particular year

PERCENT: 446 U. S. 242, less than 1%, 410 U. S. 614, 434 U. S. 357, over 80%

NORP: §, §§

MONEY: 103,000, 84,500, 18,500, 1,000, about $151,000, 650,000, 592,000, 87,407,000, 98,992,000, 119,632,000, 981,000, 870,000, 4,600,000, 559,800, 194,800, 44,300, 4,900

WORK_OF_ART: The Due Process Clause, the Due Process Clause

PRODUCT: Eldridge

TIME: the hours of the day, school hours

ORDINAL: first