Wingo Vs. Wedding - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jun-26-1974

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: the Magistrates Act, Constitution, the Federal Magistrates Act, the Judiciary Act, the Judicial Code, Rule 4, Article III of the Constitution, Federal Magistrates Act, The Federal Magistrates Act

PERSON: Wingo, Wingo v. Wedding, Johnson, Brown v. Allen, § 636(b, J., STEWART, MARSHALL, BLACKMUN, BRENNAN, Carl James Wedding, Local Rule 16, Johnston, Marshall, Revisers, Local Rule, Cong, J. Moore, William W. Barron, H.R.Rep, McMillen, O'Shea, Norlander, CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER, JUSTICE WHITE, Tydings, the Habeas Corpus Act, Charles J. Zinn, Brown, Salinger v. Loisel, Salinger, §, Hayman

CARDINAL: 418, 28, 1, 231, 16, 2, 3, 483, 456, 245, two, 461, One, 414, 4, 14, 385, 6, 8, 761, 9, 213, 10, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 313, 5, 40, 46, 1(3, 62, 830, 917, 869, 2d, 442, 445, 7, 460, 636(b)(1, 53(b, 229, 244, 321, 364, 371, 26, 491, 774, 489, 642, 10,800, 2255, approximately 530, 325, 383, 400, less than 1.5, 80, 631, 2/1, 11, 2/2, 2/3, 755, 2/4, 469, 2/5, 344, 265, 342, three, 25, 2/6

GPE: U.S., the United States, Kentucky, United States, R.S., the Hearings on S. 3475, Cong, pp, Massachusetts, District Judges

DATE: 1974, April 22, 1974, June 26, 1974, 2243, 1131, 1968, ten days, 1949, 1971, 1972, 1941, Holiday, 1131, 1137, 75, 1807, 1963, February 5, 1867, c. 28, 1948, 1952, 1953, ' 28, 761, old, 1958, six months, one year, 1133, 1559, 1947, 1192, 1194, CA7 1972, 1038, 1189, 1970, 3475, 1966, September 1966, 1967, March 1967, 1973, 1188-1189, 1-year, CA1 1974, one day, today, 1629, 33 years ago, 2254, 1924, 2255

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, Syllabus, the Federal Magistrates Act, Magistrate, the District Court, The District Court, The Court of Appeals, Congress, Court, DOUGLAS, POWELL, REHNQUIST, BURGER, C.J., WHITE, J., Kentucky State Penitentiary, the Webster Circuit Court, Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Court of Appeals, the Sixth Circuit, Holiday v., District] Court, Fay v. Noia, the Committee of the Judiciary of the Senate, House, Act, Emphasis, the Judicial Conference of the United States, The Committee on the Administration of the Criminal Law of the Judicial Conference, Speiser v. Randall, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the U.S. Judicial Code 436 n. 78, Payne, TPO, the Committee on the Administration of the Criminal Law, the Judicial Conference, the Subcommittee on Improvements in Judicial Machinery, the Senate Committee, 87 Harv, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, the Administrative Office of United States Courts, Table C-2, Table C-8, Court of Appeals, the Law Revision Committee

LOC: the Western District, The District Judge's

PRODUCT: Local Rule 16, Notes, A178, 348, 241n, Hayman

PERCENT: 313 U. S. 342, less than 5%, 88%, 418 U. S.

NORP: §, § 636(b

FAC: the Habeas Corpus Act

WORK_OF_ART: The District Judge, [Wedding's

MONEY: more than $500, more than $1,000

ORDINAL: 89th, 90th, first, second, third