Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sunaina Devi Vs. Raj Narayan Singh

Decided On : Aug-30-2013

Court : Patna

LAW: Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 13, the Hindu Marriage Act, Order 9 Rule 13, the Hindu Marriage Act, Order 9 Rule 13

PERSON: JUDICATURE, Sunaina Devi, Ram Swaroop Singh, Raj Narayan Singh, Mahua, P.S.-Mahua, District- Vaishali, Applicant-Appellant, Raj Narayan Singh, Anandi Singh, Paharpur Toi, P.S.- Desari, District- Vaishali 2, Arjun Singh, Ram Sagar Singh, Shankar Sah, Sri Sant Lal Sah, District- Vaishali, Appearance, Uday, Manindra Kishore, Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Vaishali, Miscellaneous, MA, Aaj, MA, MA, Aaj, MA, Vaishali

CARDINAL: 2011, 1, 3, 08-2013, 5.1.2011, 18, 7.2000, 18.8.1999, Four, 11, 14.2, 2, 3, 5.1.2011, 5.1.2011

GPE: Kadilpur, Kadilpur, P.S.+P.O.-Mahua, Sherpur, Hajipur, Hindi, Hajipur

ORG: HONOURABLE MR, JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HONOURABLE MR, JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT, JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, Navin Sinha & We, the Vikash Jain, Family Court, Matrimonial, Patna High Court, Appellant, Suit, Appellant, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Appellant, Court, Patna High Court, Justice, Court, no.1, no.1, the Patna High Court, Court, Family Court, Navin Sinha, Patna, NAFR/P.K./-

PRODUCT: Appellant, no.1, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, no.1, Appellant

DATE: the year 1983, 2011, April 2000, 1998, daily, 11 months, 2011, 18.8. 1999, 10.5.2002, 2011, 2011, daily, 2011, August, 2013

WORK_OF_ART: Appellant, Appellant

ORDINAL: 30th

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //