Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Glover Vs. United States
Decided On : Dec-31-1969
Court : US Supreme Court
LAW: the Direct Tax Act, section 35
PERSON: Glover, Glover, c. 496, Benjamin R. Bythewood, Verdier, McKee, Saint Luke's, Verdier, Norwich, Worster, Maillard v.Lawrence, furnish, Farnsworth, Norwich, Villalonga
GPE: United States, U.S., United States, U.S., U.S., South Carolina, the United States, Bythewood, St. Helena Island, Bythewood, the United States, St. Helena, Bythewood, United States, Saint Helena, the State of South Carolina, South Carolina, South Carolina, Hardin, South Carolina, Bythewood, St. Helena Island, the United States, Boston, Beaufort, the United States, United States
DATE: 1969, 1896, November 3, 1896, November 80, 1896, 1861, March 3, 1891, 1861, November, 1861, 1861, March 2, 1891, 1861, 1861, 1891, 1891, 1891, 1891, 1791, 80, 1891, 1891, 1861, 1891, 1861, 1861, 1861, 1891, 1861, 1861, 1891, 1891, 1891, 1891, years, 1891, 1891, 1861, 1891
ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Congress, Court, State of South Carolina, Congress, Congress, Treasury, Congress, Congress, the Supreme Court of South Carolina, Hardin, S.C. 77,, Great Falls Co., N.H. 412, Smythe v. Fiske, Treasury, Congress, Congress, Congress, Congress, Congress, Congress, the Court of Claims
PRODUCT: Glover
CARDINAL: 164, 140, 164, 294, 12, 294, 26, 822, 5, 169, 34, 22, 587, 594, 15, 434, 16, 251, 23, 374, one, 126, 1, one-half, half, 23, 97
LOC: the Town of Beaufort
FAC: St. Helena Parish, Port Royal
NORP: c. 496
ORDINAL: fourth, fourth