Reitman Vs. Mulkey - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: May-29-1967

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 26 of Art, Proposition 14, the Civil Code, The Unruh Act, The Hawkins Act, the Hawkins Act, the Federal Constitution, Section 26, section 26, Article I, Sections, Constitution, Article, Section 51, Article I Section 26, the Unruh Act, the National Housing Act, Title IV of the proposed, Civil Rights Act, the Fifteenth Amendment, the State Constitution

PERSON: Reitman, Art, 387 U. S. 373 -381, Mulkey v. Reitman, Mulkeys, Petitioner Snyder, Snyder, Yick Wo v. Hopkins, Robinson, Turner, Anderson, Rumford, Burton, Barrows, Jackson, STEWART, Wilmington, McCabe, Nixon, Condon, Peterson, Shelley, Kraemer, Hill, Miller, Peyton, Barrington Plaza, Herndon, DOUGLAS, George A. McCanse, Berman, Parker, Terry v. Adams, Bell, Lane v. Cotton, James Madison, JUSTICE CLARK

GPE: U.S., the United States, California, Atchison, Louisiana, Florida, MR, Delaware, Rumford, Negroes, Greenville, New Orleans, Barrington Plaza, the City of Los Angeles, United States, Maryland, States, Holt, Mod, Washington, D.C., the State of California

DATE: 1967, March 221, 1967, May 29, 1967, 1959-1963, 1964, 52, December, 1964, 1959, 1961, 1963, the same day, 33, 14, 1966, H.R. 14765, 10130, recent years, 27278, 1701, 1962, 16, 1639, today, the last decade, 109 U. S. 3

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, THE SUPREME COURT OF, The California Legislature, State, The California Supreme Court, Court, the Equal Protection Clause of, the California Constitution, the California Supreme Court, the Equal Protection Clause, McCabe, Topeka & Santa Fe R. Co., Martin, the California Legislature, Health & Safety Code §§ 35700-35741, the Rumford Fair Housing Act,, the State Fair Employment Practice Commission, Unruh, Rumford Acts, Wilmington Parking Authority, Topeka Santa Fe R. Co., Parking Authority, Abstract Investment Co., Hutchinson, Negro, California Constitution, Barrington Plaza Corp., the Commission on Civil Rights:, U.S. Commission, the Commission on Race and Housing, the Texas Real Estate Association, Ambler Co., the Jaybird Association, the States Page 387 U. S. 385, Nation, Government, Governments, Community, U.S. Commission on, the Hannah Commission, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 96, the House Committee, the Supreme Court of California, The Equal Protection Clause of, Takahashi, Fish & Game Comm'n, Brown v. Board of Education, Goss v. Board of Education

CARDINAL: 387, 483, 26, 64, 529, 877, 413, 825, 847, 370, 1, two, 52, 3, 51, 5, 385, 6, more than four, one, 8, 2, 14, 14 1/2, two hundred fifty dollars, 4, 204, 242, 22, 309, 852, 415, 849, 2,500, 2/1, 2/2, 2/3, 2/4, 2/5, 2/6, 2/7, 2/8, 2/9, 12, 472, 484, 115, 15, 2d, 4,526,460, 2,395,747

EVENT: the California Civil Code, the California Constitution

NORP: Reitman, Caucasian, Caucasians, non-Caucasians, Chinese, Japanese, Russians, Catholics, Baptists, §

ORDINAL: first, First, Second, Third, 89th

PERCENT: 118 U. S. 356, 286 U. S. 73, 90 percent, 272 U. S. 365

MONEY: 250, 17,000,000

PRODUCT: 757

FAC: 880

WORK_OF_ART: Caucasian