Reisman Vs. Caplin - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jan-20-1964

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: Page 375 U. S. 447 $1,000

PERSON: Reisman, Reisman v. Caplin, Bromley, Bromleys, CLARK, Martin J. and, Allyn Bromley, Albert Lindley, Lee Memorial Hospital, Cir, Falsone, Cong, Boren, Tucker, Sale, McCrone, Brody v. United States, O'Connor v. O'Connell, Martin v. Chandis Securities Co., Application of Davis, Babcock, Becker, Brownson

GPE: U.S., United States, Caplin, the United States, California, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, the District of Columbia, Bouschor, pp

DATE: 1964, December 12, 1963, January 20, 1964, 1954, 7602, D.C. 59, several years, April, 1960, June 13, 1961, July 7, 1961, 1908, 1920, each day, more than a year, 1864, 2440-2441, 2997, 1913, 1939, 1919, 7603, 22, 1938

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, Syllabus, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the Internal Revenue Code, District Court, Congress, Court, Internal Revenue Commissioner, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., The District Court, The Court of Appeals, Bromley, the Tax Court, the Court of Appeals, the Internal Revenue Service, Treasury, the District Court, Corbin Deposit Bank, the District Courts, Oklahoma Operating Co., the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, § 7604(b, Globe, D. I. Operating Co., Contra, 7604(b, Federal Power Comm'n v. Metropolitan Edison Co., Sale

CARDINAL: 375, 119, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 115, 317, 123, 374, three, four, 125, 209, 122, 205, 734, 244, 177, 13, 226, 38, 179, 449, 239, 772, 228, 682, 243, 378, 253, 365, 316, 451, 128, 731, 321, 586, 303, 601, transferee, 6421(f)(2, 259, 869, 9, 32, 844

ORDINAL: third, first

PERCENT: 209 U. S. 123, 304 U. S. 375

WORK_OF_ART: Love

MONEY: 500, 6420(e)(2, more than $1,000

PRODUCT: 767