Citation network
New York Rapid Transit Corp. Vs. New York
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 28, 1938
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
was not held invalid because there was no relation between the taxpayer and the appropriation. See Cincinnati Soap Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
from the contracts clause. More than a hundred years ago, it was stated by Chief Justice Marshall in Providence Bank v. BillingsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. NewSearch
-
New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. CitySearch
-
Seaboard Air Line v. SeegersSearch
-
Southern R. Co. v. WattsSearch
-
the City's Legislature. See Carmichael v. SouthernSearch
-
Cohn v. GravesSearch
-
In Clark v. TitusvilleSearch
-
Western Live Stock v. BingamanSearch
-
Cincinnati Soap Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In Colgate v. HarveySearch
-
Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSearch
-
and Air Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. DaySearch
-
Alaska Fish Salting & By-Products Co. v. SmithSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In United States v. ButlerSearch
-
See Cincinnati Soap Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Stewart Dry Goods Co. v. LewisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial