Glover Vs. Patten — Cites
- U.S. 394 (1897) U.S. Supreme Court Glover v. Patten
- U.S. 394 (1897) Glover v. Patten
- purpose of establishing their debt. To such a suit other creditors are not necessary parties. The case of Dandridge v. Custis
- in a suit in admiralty to establish a claim against a vessel, although they may be admitted to defend. Wiser v. Blachly
- Pritchard v. Page
- West v. Randall
- been held by the Supreme Court of Maryland that the act of 1715, which is still in force in this District, Shepherd v. Thompson
- does not apply to a claim by an executor against his estate, inasmuch as the executor cannot sue himself at law, State v. Reigart
- Brown v. Stewart
- Spencer v. Spencer
- Semmes v. Young's
- Plunkett v. Lewis
- when the contest is between the heirs or next of kin. That reason is thus stated by Lord Brougham in Greenough v. Gaskell
- In Russell v. Jackson
- An epitome of this case is given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Swayne in Blackburn v. Crawfords
- See also Hunt v. Blackburn
- Scott v. Harris
- Graham v. O'Fallon
- Goddard v. Gardner
- was not a transaction with or a statement by the testator within the meaning of the statute. Monongahela National Bank v. Jacobus
- than a presumption, and may be rebutted by slight evidence that such was not the intention of the testator. Spencer v. Spencer
- Gilliam v. Brown
- Williams v. Crary
- Eaton v. Benton
- Reynolds v. Robinson
- Heisler v. Sharp
- Homer's Executors Page 165 U. S. 411 v. McGaughy
- Crouch v. Davis'