Citation network
Schriro Vs. Landrigan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 14, 2007
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Coleman v. MitchellSearch
-
that he suffered prejudice when his attorney failed to investigate and present mitigating evidence. See Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
en banc). Counsel failed to follow up on any of these leads. Footnote 2 See, e.g. , Brookhart v. JanisSearch
-
Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
Dora B. Schriro, Director, Arizona Depart- Ment of Corrections, Petitioner V. JeffreySearch
-
Brown v. AllenSearch
-
See Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
Mayes v. GibsonSearch
-
the Ninth Circuit. See Anderson v. AttorneySearch
-
Clark v. JohnsonSearch
-
Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
In Rompilla v. BeardSearch
-
State v. ByersSearch
-
State v. PopeSearch
-
See Wiggins v. SmithSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Abdul-Kabir v. QuartermanSearch
-
See Townsend v. SainSearch
-
See Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSearch
-
Cf. Yee v. EscondidoSearch
-
See Hill v. LockhartSearch
-
See Battenfield v. GibsonSearch
-
Adams v. UnitedSearch
-
Green v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial