Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Gonzales Vs. Oregon

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 17, 2006

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

74 entries 10 linked 64 unlinked Page 2 of 2
Show
  1. First, it might mean any oral or written direction of a practitioner for the dispensation of drugs. See United States v. Moore
    Search
  2. that we ourselves have adopted. Webb v. United
    Search
  3. of the Directive, renders Chevron inapplicable here. See Reply Brief for Petitioners 4 (citing Barnhart v. Walton
    Search
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  5. Cf. Sutton v. United
    Search
  6. Petitioners V. Oregon
    Search
  7. and Schedule v. the
    Search
  8. Oregon v. Ashcroft
    Search
  9. Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon
    Search
  10. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand
    Search
  11. Adams Fruit Co. v. Barrett
    Search
  12. See Crandon v. United
    Search
  13. FDA v. Brown
    Search
  14. Christensen v. Harris
    Search
  15. United States v. Oakland
    Search
  16. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Massachusetts
    Search
  17. See Massachusetts v. Morash
    Search
  18. BFP v. Resolution
    Search
  19. Affirmed. Gonzales v. Oregon
    Search
  20. of Schedule v. substances
    Search
  21. See United States v. Moore
    Search
  22. Webb v. United
    Search
  23. Bowles v. Seminole
    Search
  24. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial