Citation network
Day Vs. Mcdonough
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 25, 2006
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
s Rule 14.1(a). We note, however, that the Court recently granted certiorari in Lawrence v. FloridaSearch
-
Ibid. (referring to Jackson v. SecretarySearch
-
s time bar sU. S.onte . As this Court recognized in Pliler v. FordSearch
-
to Rules 4 and 11, effective December 1, 2004, wrought no relevant substantive change. Footnote 8 See Rhines v. WeberSearch
-
quoting Duncan v. WalkerSearch
-
to disregard that choice. See supra , at 2. But see post , at 7 (Scalia, J., dissenting). Day v. McDonoughSearch
-
Court should announce its opinion now, but it should postpone the entry of judgment pending our decision in Lawrence v. FloridaSearch
-
In Granberry v. GreerSearch
-
Patrick Day, Petitioner V. JamesSearch
-
Coates v. ByrdSearch
-
See Nyland v. MooreSearch
-
Jackson v. SecretarySearch
-
Long v. WilsonSearch
-
Scott v. CollinsSearch
-
and Nardi v. StewartSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Acosta v. ArtuzSearch
-
See Brewer v. MarshallSearch
-
See Mayle v. FelixSearch
-
Lawrence v. FloridaSearch
-
See Rhines v. WeberSearch
-
Duncan v. WalkerSearch
-
Scalia, J., Dissenting Day V. McdonoughSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial