Citation network
Hamdan Vs. Rumsfeld
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 29, 2006
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
is itself highly questionable. The cases that Justice Scalia cites to support his distinction are Republic of Austria v. AltmannSearch
-
U. S. 677 (2004), and Hughes Aircraft Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S., at 951, we have applied the same analysis to statutes that have jurisdiction-stripping effect, see Lindh v. MurphySearch
-
Parts v. andSearch
-
See Doe v. ChaoSearch
-
Johnson v. EisentragerSearch
-
Loving v. UnitedSearch
-
Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Petitioner V. DonaldSearch
-
Cf. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSearch
-
Bruner v. UnitedSearch
-
Republic of Austria v. AltmannSearch
-
Russello v. UnitedSearch
-
See New v. CohenSearch
-
Quackenbush v. AllstateSearch
-
of World War II. See Madsen v. KinsellaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the Constitution. Cf. Loving v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Rasul v. BushSearch
-
See Hughes Aircraft Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
and Insurance Co. v. RitchieSearch
-
and Hughes Aircraft Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Toth v. QuarlesSearch
-
United States v. KleinSearch
-
Reid v. CovertSearch
-
Noyd v. BondSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial