Citation network
United States Vs. Patane
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 28, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
York, 401 U. S. 222 (1971), though the fruits of actually compelled testimony cannot, see New Jersey v. PortashSearch
-
Withrow , 507 U. S., at 691 (quoting United States v. Verdugo-UrquidezSearch
-
See also Nix v. WilliamsSearch
-
cf. Nardone v. UnitedSearch
-
s answers to subsequent on-the-scene questioning are inadmissible at trial under Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
s assertions that he knew his rights. Footnote 2 The Court of Appeals also distinguished Oregon v. ElstadSearch
-
Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
and Michigan v. TuckerSearch
-
of Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
Dickerson v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Graham v. ConnorSearch
-
In Oregon v. ElstadSearch
-
and Harris v. NewSearch
-
the Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
Elstad and Michigan v. TuckerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States, Petitioner V. SamuelSearch
-
See Massachusetts v. WhiteSearch
-
Patterson v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. Villalba-AlvaradoSearch
-
and United States v. DeSummaSearch
-
Kastigar v. UnitedSearch
-
Nix v. WilliamsSearch
-
Nardone v. UnitedSearch
-
Stansbury v. CaliforniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial