Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Gratz Vs. Bollinger

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 23, 2003

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

68 entries 10 linked 58 unlinked Page 2 of 2
Show
  1. consideration. The University, of course, remains free to modify its system so that it does so. Cf. Grutter v. Bollinger
    Search
  2. join the Court's opinion because I believe it correctly applies our precedents, including to day's decision in Grutter v. Bollinger
    Search
  3. from continuing to use its current raceconscious freshman admissions policy. Yet unlike the plaintiff in Grutter v. Bollinger
    Search
  4. Syllabus Gratz Et Al. V. Bollinger
    Search
  5. Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke
    Search
  6. See General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon
    Search
  7. Alexander v. Sandoval
    Search
  8. and Carl v. Angelis
    Search
  9. See Gratz v. Bollinger
    Search
  10. In Clements v. Fash
    Search
  11. Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay
    Search
  12. American Pipe & Constr. Co. v. Utah
    Search
  13. Wygant v. Jackson
    Search
  14. Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC
    Search
  15. Cf. Regents of Univ. of Gal. v. Bakke
    Search
  16. See Grutter v. Bollinger
    Search
  17. of Title VI. See Alexander v. Sandoval
    Search
  18. Cf. Grutter v. Bollinger
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial