Citation network
Saenz Vs. Roe
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 17, 1999
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Roe v. AndersonSearch
-
federal-state program by legislation which authorizes the States to violate the Equal Protection Clause.' Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
grants Congress no power to restrict, abrogate, or dilute these guarantees.' Katzenbach v. MorganSearch
-
nor a State can validate a law that denies the rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. See, e. g., Califano v. GoldfarbSearch
-
Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment-a Clause relied upon by this Court in only one other decision, Colgate v. HarveySearch
-
Syllabus Saenz, Director, California Department of Social Services, Et Al. V. RoeSearch
-
Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
and Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
of the Constitution. See Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
Massachusetts. See Green v. AndersonSearch
-
the District Judge. Green v. AndersonSearch
-
Beno v. ShalalaSearch
-
Anderson v. RoeSearch
-
See Maldonado v. HoustonSearch
-
See Mitchell v. SteffenSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Jones v. MilwaukeeSearch
-
United States v. JacksonSearch
-
Edwards v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Baldwin v. FishSearch
-
Dred Scott v. SandfordSearch
-
See Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
the Equal Protection Clause.' Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
Katzenbach v. MorganSearch
-
Women v. HoganSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial