Citation network
Lambrix Vs. Singletary
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 12, 1997
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
must consider whether the relief sought falls within one of the two narrow exceptions to nonretroactivity. See Gilmore v. TaylorSearch
-
to consider this contention because it is not fairly within the question presented, which asked only whether Teague v. LaneSearch
-
U. S. 288 (1989), bars relief based upon Espinosa v. FloridaSearch
-
Court's Rule 14.1(a). 528 conviction was apparent to all reasonable jurists. See, e. g., Graham v. CollinsSearch
-
Syllabus Lambrix V. SingletarySearch
-
Espinosa v. FloridaSearch
-
Coleman v. ThompsonSearch
-
Baldwin v. AlabamaSearch
-
Lambrix-Godfrey v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Proffitt v. FloridaSearch
-
Walton v. ArizonaSearch
-
Sochor v. FloridaSearch
-
and Sawyer v. SmithSearch
-
the Florida Supreme Court. Lambrix v. StateSearch
-
Lambrix v. DuggerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Chandler v. DuggerSearch
-
Jackson v. DuggerSearch
-
and Henderson v. SingletarySearch
-
In Coleman v. ThompsonSearch
-
Harris v. ReedSearch
-
Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
Brown v. AllenSearch
-
Sawyer v. SmithSearch
-
Tedder v. StateSearch
-
Ross v. StateSearch
-
See Caspari v. BohlenSearch
-
the Constitution,' Saffle v. ParksSearch
-
See Gilmore v. TaylorSearch
-
Herb v. PitcairnSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial