Citation network
United States Vs. Lopez
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 26, 1995
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
movement of lottery tickets because it had power only to regulate, not to prohibit. See also Hipolite Egg Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Hoke v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 227 U. S. 308 (1913). In Hammer v. DagenhartSearch
-
of a practical conception of the commerce power was not altogether confined to the rate cases. In Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Ibid. Chief Justice Taft followed the same approach in upholding federal regulation of stockyards in Stafford v. WallaceSearch
-
Syllabus United States V. LopezSearch
-
the Commerce Clause. See Wickard v. FilburnSearch
-
In A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
of NLRB v. JonesSearch
-
In United States v. DarbySearch
-
United States v. WrightwoodSearch
-
Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
Maryland v. WirtzSearch
-
Garcia v. SanSearch
-
Caminetti v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the Commerce Clause. Compare Preseault v. ICCSearch
-
Screws v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. FiveSearch
-
Preseault v. ICCSearch
-
Cf. Fullilove v. KlutznickSearch
-
See United States v. EvansSearch
-
McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
Adair v. UnitedSearch
-
Standard Oil Co. of N. J. v. UnitedSearch
-
Texas & New Orleans R. Co. v. RailwaySearch
-
Hipolite Egg Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In Hammer v. DagenhartSearch
-
In Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Katzenbach v. McClungSearch
-
Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
Engle v. IsaacSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial