Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Hagen Vs. Utah

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 02, 1993

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

68 entries 17 linked 51 unlinked Page 2 of 2
Show
  1. U. S. 463 , 470 (1984), quoting Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip
    Search
  2. see also DeCoteau v. District
    Search
  3. statement of congressional intent, United States v. Santa
    Search
  4. see also Carpenter v. Shaw
    Search
  5. ambiguous provisions should be construed in favor of the Indians was first articulated by Justice McLean in Worcester v. Geor
    Search
  6. see also Choate v. Trapp
    Search
  7. Syllabus HAGEN v. UTAH
    Search
  8. Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah
    Search
  9. Lone Wolf v. Hitch
    Search
  10. of State v. Perank
    Search
  11. IV In Solem v. Bartlett
    Search
  12. County of Yakima v. Confederated
    Search
  13. See Sioux Tribe v. United
    Search
  14. In Seymour v. Superintendent
    Search
  15. Hanson v. United
    Search
  16. Choctaw Nation v. United
    Search
  17. United States v. Santa
    Search
  18. Worcester v. Geor
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial