Citation network
United States Vs. Dixon
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 02, 1992
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
the second prosecution is not barred-as it clearly was not barred at common law, as a famous case establishes. In King v. VandercombSearch
-
to perfect their case seems unjustified. They have little to gain and much to lose from such a strategy. Under Ashe v. SwensonSearch
-
we do so here. Solorio v. UnitedSearch
-
Syllabus United States V. DixonSearch
-
and Burton v. UnitedSearch
-
Harris v. OklahomaSearch
-
See United States v. HudsonSearch
-
See Bloom v. IllinoisSearch
-
Sparhawk v. UnionSearch
-
King v. LordSearch
-
See North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
Gompers v. BucksSearch
-
Accord, Menna v. NewSearch
-
Brown v. OhioSearch
-
Accord, Whalen v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and Jurney v. MacCrackenSearch
-
Parker v. UnitedSearch
-
See Logan v. UnitedSearch
-
Pernell v. SouthallSearch
-
See United States Nat. Bank of Ore. v. IndependentSearch
-
Grafton v. UnitedSearch
-
Garrett v. UnitedSearch
-
In King v. VandercombSearch
-
Under Ashe v. SwensonSearch
-
Solorio v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial