Citation network
Saffle Vs. Parks
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 05, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. at 492 U. S. 321 (quoting Franklin v. LynaughSearch
-
quoting McCleskey v. KempSearch
-
in which the jury considers the evidence despite such a statute's obvious preclusive effect. Cf. McKoy v. NorthSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Saffle v. ParksSearch
-
Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
and Eddings v. OklahomaSearch
-
Similarly, California v. PageSearch
-
the Eighth Amendment. In Penry v. LynaughSearch
-
of Teague v. LaneSearch
-
the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, Parks v. StateSearch
-
Parks v. BrownSearch
-
Parks. Parks v. BrownSearch
-
Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
See Hitchcock v. DuggerSearch
-
of Lockett and Eddings. See Byrne v. ButlerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
I In Teague v. LaneSearch
-
of Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
Eddings v. OklahomaSearch
-
and Penry v. LynaughSearch
-
Cf. McKoy v. NorthSearch
-
Cf. Smith v. MurraySearch
-
Roberts v. LouisianaSearch
-
California v. RamosSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial