Citation network
GriffIn Vs. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 30, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Griffin v. OceanicSearch
-
Contractors, Inc. - 458 U.S. 564 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Griffin v. OceanicSearch
-
Contractors, Inc., 458 U.S. 564 (1982) Griffin v. OceanicSearch
-
was unable to work was for sufficient cause, its decision to limit the penalty was error. Pacific Mail S.S. Co. v. SchmidtSearch
-
McCrea v. UnitedSearch
-
Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTESearch
-
United States v. AmericanSearch
-
Trucking Assns., Inc., 310 U. S. 534 , 310 U. S. 543 (1940). See Caminetti v. UnitedSearch
-
Commissioner v. BrownSearch
-
U. S. 563 , 380 U. S. 571 (1965) (quoting Helvering v. HammelSearch
-
This, however, is not the exceptional case. Page 458 U. S. 572 As the Court recognized in Collie v. FergussonSearch
-
to be avoided if alternative interpretations consistent with the legislative purpose are available. See United States v. AmericanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Congress did not precisely envision the trebled amount of some damages awards in private antitrust actions, see Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
TVA v. HillSearch
-
we may not. See Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTESearch
-
Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
at 442 U. S. 344 -345. Finally, we note that our holding is consistent with Pacific Mail S.S. Co. v. SchmidtSearch
-
To the extent that the equities of the situation are to be considered, see Collie v. FergussonSearch
-
for each day until the wages are paid, and to leave no room for the district court's exercise of discretion. Swain v. IsthmianSearch
-
Larkins v. HudsonSearch
-
for the First, Second, and Fourth Circuits have adopted the interpretation followed by the Fifth Circuit. Mavromatis v. UnitedSearch
-
Forster v. OroSearch
-
Southern Cross S.S. Co. v. FiripisSearch
-
F.2d 651 (CA4 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 869 (1961). We noted this conflict in American Foreign S.S. Co. v. MatiseSearch
-
of the penalty period unless delays beyond that date are explained by sufficient cause. See Pacific Mail S.S. Co. v. SchmidtSearch
-
delays are supported by sufficient cause). The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Southern Cross S.S. Co. v. FiripisSearch
-
F.2d at 660, and the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Swain v. IsthmianSearch
-
it is perfectly consistent with this Court's contemporary construction of the statute in Pacific Mail S.S. Co. v. SchmidtSearch
-
was McCrea v. UnitedSearch
-
Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSearch
-
of Congress. It was not until 1966 that a contrary reading of the statute was adopted by the Third Circuit in Swan v. IsthmianSearch
-
United States Secretary of Labor to determine whether a federal statute violates the Federal Constitution. California v. GraceSearch
-
Holy Trinity Church v. UnitedSearch
-
See Mystic S.S. Co. v. StromlandSearch
-
Mavromatis v. UnitedSearch
-
Prindes v. S.SSearch
-
Caribbean Federation Lines v. DahlSearch
-
McConville v. FloridaSearch
-
Samad v. TheSearch
-
Spero v. SteamshipSearch
-
Ventiadis v. C.JSearch
-
Swanson v. TorSearch
-
See Southern Cross S.S. Co. v. FiripisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Griffin v. OceanicSearch
-
Pacific Mail S.S. Co. v. SchmidtSearch
-
See Caminetti v. UnitedSearch
-
Helvering v. HammelSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial