Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Enmund Vs. Florida

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jul 02, 1982

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

59 entries 7 linked 52 unlinked
Show
  1. Gregg Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1976
  2. Coker Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1977
  3. Lockett Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jul 03, 1978
  4. Mullaney Vs. Wilbur US Supreme Court · Jun 09, 1975
  5. Proffitt Vs. Florida US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1976
  6. Eddings Vs. Oklahoma US Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1982
  7. O'Neil Vs. Vermont US Supreme Court · Apr 04, 1892
  8. U.S. 782 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  9. U.S. 782 (1982) Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  10. Id. at 1369, quoting Adams v. State
    Search
  11. Ibid., citing Armstrong v. State
    Search
  12. Weems v. United
    Search
  13. States, 217 U. S. 349 , 217 U. S. 371 (1910), quoting O'Neil v. Vermont
    Search
  14. Field, J., dissenting). This Court most recently held a punishment excessive in relation to the crime charged in Coker v. Georgia
    Search
  15. S. 593 . More importantly, in reenacting death penalty laws in order to satisfy the criteria established in Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  16. supra, at 433 U. S. 596 , quoting Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  17. By contrast, there were 72 executions for rape in this country between 1955 and this Court's decision in Coker v. Georgia
    Search
  18. Woodson v. North
    Search
  19. the culpability of those who killed the Kerseys. This was impermissible under the Eighth Amendment. In Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  20. and hence an unconstitutional punishment. Coker v. Georgia
    Search
  21. Fisher v. United
    Search
  22. has found criminal penalties to be unconstitutionally excessive in the absence of intentional wrongdoing. In Robinson v. California
    Search
  23. was struck down under the Eighth Amendment. Similarly, in Weems v. United
    Search
  24. U.S. at 217 U. S. 363 . The Court employed a similar approach in Godfrey v. Georgia
    Search
  25. is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  26. So.2d at 1369 (quoting Adams v. State
    Search
  27. Ibid. (quoting Pope v. State
    Search
  28. petitioner's crime. Consequently, these facts supported only one aggravating circumstance. Second, citing Armstrong v. State
    Search
  29. In Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  30. to his crimes. A The Eighth Amendment concept of proportionality was first fully expressed in Weems v. United
    Search
  31. was cruel and unusual. Id. at 217 U. S. 381 . Not until two-thirds of a century later, in Coker v. Georgia
    Search
  32. the meaning of the requirement of proportionality contained within the Eighth Amendment. Trop v. Dulles
    Search
  33. only 3 of the 35 States that immediately reinstituted the death penalty following the Court's judgment in Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  34. U.S. at 433 U. S. 596 . See Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  35. that both legislatures and juries firmly rejected the penalty of death for the crime of rape. See Woodson v. North
    Search
  36. these latter factors underlying the concept of proportionality are reflected in this Court's conclusion in Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  37. statutes allowing juries the discretion to decide whether to impose or to recommend the death penalty. See Woodson v. North
    Search
  38. penalty for accomplice felony murder. Moreover, as JUSTICE BLACKMUN pointed out in his concurring opinion in Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  39. felony murder, Coker v. Georgia
    Search
  40. opinion of Stewart, POWELL, and STEVENS, JJ.). In striking down the mandatory capital punishment statute in Woodson v. North
    Search
  41. In Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  42. Green v. Georgia
    Search
  43. resistance, and not that the petitioner had killed them in an effort to eliminate them as witnesses. See Armstrong v. State
    Search
  44. in imposing sentence. Woodson v. North
    Search
  45. that they were committed for pecuniary gain, and that they were especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel. See Armstrong v. State
    Search
  46. U.S. Supreme Court Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  47. Adams v. State
    Search
  48. Armstrong v. State
    Search
  49. Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  50. the Eighth Amendment. In Gregg v. Georgia
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial