Citation network
United States Vs. Feola
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 19, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 671 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. FeolaSearch
-
U.S. 671 (1975) United States v. FeolaSearch
-
officers. The Court of Appeals approved the instructions on the substantive charges but, in reliance on United States v. CrimminsSearch
-
affirmed the judgment of conviction on the substantive charges, but reversed the conspiracy convictions. United States v. AlsondoSearch
-
The court perceived itself bound by a line of cases, commencing with Judge Learned Hand's opinion in United States v. CrimminsSearch
-
before. In Ladner v. UnitedSearch
-
a shorthand expression of the need for a statute to fill a gap in the substantive law of the States. See United States v. FernandezSearch
-
would be read as requiring the same degree of knowledge as its state law counterparts. See Morissette v. UnitedSearch
-
the Government must prove at least the degree of criminal intent necessary for the substantive offense itself. Ingram v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 360 U. S. 672 , 360 U. S. 678 (1959). See Pettibone v. UnitedSearch
-
held that the statute required only that the conspirators agree to participate in the prohibited conduct. See Anderson v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, 417 U. S. 211 , 417 U. S. 226 (1974). Similarly, in United States v. FreedSearch
-
statute or in this Court's decisions, respondent relies solely on the line of cases commencing with United States v. CrimminsSearch
-
generally fall into that category of offenses that dispense with a mens rea requirement. See United States v. DotterweichSearch
-
does not call upon us to answer this question, and we decline to do so, just as we have once before. United States v. FreedSearch
-
originating in People v. PowellSearch
-
as a conspirator for acts the precise details of which one does not know at the time of the agreement. See Blumenthal v. UnitedSearch
-
Because of this, consecutive sentences may be imposed for the conspiracy and for the underlying crime. Callanan v. UnitedSearch
-
Pinkerton v. UnitedSearch
-
by the law of conspiracy. The first is protection of society from the dangers of concerted criminal activity, Callanan v. UnitedSearch
-
Dennis v. UnitedSearch
-
plus an overt act in pursuit of it, regardless of whether the crime agreed upon actually is committed. United States v. BayerSearch
-
United States v. CrimminsSearch
-
affirmed the judgment of conviction on the substantive charge, but reversed the conspiracy conviction. United States v. FarrSearch
-
United States v. IannelliSearch
-
United States v. ThompsonSearch
-
United States v. PolestiSearch
-
United States v. RoselliSearch
-
The Second Circuit consistently has so held. See, e.g., United States v. LombardozziSearch
-
United States v. MontanaroSearch
-
United States v. UlanSearch
-
E.g., Sparks v. UnitedSearch
-
Hall v. UnitedSearch
-
E.g., United States v. PerkinsSearch
-
Bennett v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. KiralySearch
-
United States v. GanterSearch
-
United States v. KartmanSearch
-
F.2d 893, 894 (CA9 1969). See United States v. LeachSearch
-
See United States v. PerkinsSearch
-
United States v. YoungSearch
-
United States v. VilhottiSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. FeolaSearch
-
United States v. AlsondoSearch
-
In Ladner v. UnitedSearch
-
of the States. See United States v. FernandezSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial